Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA

被引:828
作者
Salamov, AA [1 ]
Solovyev, VV [1 ]
机构
[1] Sanger Ctr, Cambridge CB10 1SA, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1101/gr.10.4.516
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ab initio gene identification in the genomic sequence of Drosophila melanogaster was obtained using Fgenes (human gene predictor) and Fgenesh programs that have organism-specific parameters for human, Drosophila, plants, yeast, and nematode. We did not use information about cDNA/EST in most predictions to model a real situation for Finding new genes because information about complete cDNA is often absent or based on very small partial Fragments. We investigated the accuracy of gene prediction on different levels and designed several schemes to predict an unambiguous set of genes (annotation CGG1), a set of reliable exons (annotation CGG2), and the most complete set of exons (annotation CGG3). For 49 genes, protein products of which have clear homologs in protein databases, predictions were recomputed by Fgenesh+ program. The first annotation serves as the optimal computational description of new sequence to be presented in a database. Reliable exons from the second annotation serve as good candidates for selecting the PCR primers for experimental work For gene structure verification. Our results shows that we can identify similar to 90% of coding nucleotides with 20% false positives. At the exon level we accurately predicted 65% of exons and 89% including overlapping exons with 49% false positives. Optimizing accuracy of prediction, we designed a gene identification scheme using Fgenesh, which provided sensitivity (Sn) = 98% and specificity (Sp) = 86% at the base level, Sn = 81% (97% including overlapping exons) and Sp = 58% at the exon level and Sn = 72% and Sp = 39% at the gene level (estimating sensitivity on std1 set and specificity on std3 set). In general, these results showed that computational gene prediction can be a reliable tool for annotating new genomic sequences, giving accurate Information on 90% of coding sequences with 14% false positives. However, exact gene prediction (especially at the gene level) needs additional improvement using gene prediction algorithms. The Fgenesh program was also tested for predicting genes of human Chromosome 22 (the last variant of Fgenesh can analyze the whole chromosome sequence). This analysis has demonstrated that the 88% of manually annotated exons in Chromosome 22 were among the ab initio predicted exons. The suite of gene identification programs is available through the WWW server of Computational Genomics Group at http://genomic.sanger.ac.uk/gf.html.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 522
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [J].
Altschul, SF ;
Madden, TL ;
Schaffer, AA ;
Zhang, JH ;
Zhang, Z ;
Miller, W ;
Lipman, DJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (17) :3389-3402
[2]  
Ashburner M, 1999, GENETICS, V153, P179
[3]   GenBank [J].
Benson, DA ;
Boguski, MS ;
Lipman, DJ ;
Ostell, J ;
Ouellette, BFF .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1998, 26 (01) :1-7
[4]   The Adh-related gene of Drosophila melanogaster is expressed as a functional dicistronic messenger RNA: Multigenic transcription in higher organisms [J].
Brogna, S ;
Ashburner, M .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1997, 16 (08) :2023-2031
[5]   PREDICTION OF HUMAN MESSENGER-RNA DONOR AND ACCEPTOR SITES FROM THE DNA-SEQUENCE [J].
BRUNAK, S ;
ENGELBRECHT, J ;
KNUDSEN, S .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1991, 220 (01) :49-65
[6]   Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA [J].
Burge, C ;
Karlin, S .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 268 (01) :78-94
[7]   Finding the genes in genomic DNA [J].
Burge, CB ;
Karlin, S .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (03) :346-354
[8]  
Etzold T, 1996, METHOD ENZYMOL, V266, P114
[9]   ASSESSMENT OF PROTEIN CODING MEASURES [J].
FICKETT, JW ;
TUNG, CS .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1992, 20 (24) :6441-6450
[10]   PREDICTION OF GENE STRUCTURE [J].
GUIGO, R ;
KNUDSEN, S ;
DRAKE, N ;
SMITH, T .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1992, 226 (01) :141-157