Discrepancies between desired and perceived measures of performance of IS professionals: Views of the IS professionals themselves and the users

被引:12
作者
Boyd, Michael
Huang, Shi-Ming
Jiang, James J. [1 ]
Klein, Gary
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Management Informat Syst, Coll Business, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] USAF Acad, Dept Management, Colorado Springs, CO 80840 USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Dept Management Mkt & Polit Sci, Coll Business & Publ Affairs, Martin, TN 38238 USA
[5] Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Dept Accounting & Informat Technol, Chiayi, Taiwan
关键词
IS users; IS personnel; IS success; job performance measures; satisfaction; discrepancy theory;
D O I
10.1016/j.im.2006.12.003
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Evaluation of IS professionals is difficult. Measures are seldom fully defined and suffer from the inability of a user to consider differences between expectations and perceptions of performance. In addition, expected levels of performance and perceived levels of performance depend on the satisfaction of each group of stakeholders. Discrepancy theory leads one to expect that satisfaction is highest when performance matches expectations. To explore this gap in different groups, a sample of users and a matched sample of IS professionals was investigated in order to determine the relationship between the performance gap and satisfaction with the system on the part of the users and careers on the part of the IS professionals. Larger gaps were found to be associated with poor satisfaction in both samples. Additionally, each group had a different set of expectations, indicating that the measures did not represent the same expectation or meanings to different stakeholders. Thus, management should strive to promote uniform understanding of the measures employed in IS professional performance-evaluation by all stakeholders and manage expectations according to the metrics selected. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 195
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS
[3]   DEVELOPMENT OF A TOOL FOR MEASURING AND ANALYZING COMPUTER USER SATISFACTION [J].
BAILEY, JE ;
PEARSON, SW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1983, 29 (05) :530-545
[4]   SMIS Members: A Membership Analysis [J].
Ball, Leslie ;
Harris, Richard .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1982, 6 (01) :19-38
[5]  
Baroudi J. J., 1988, Journal of Management Information Systems, V4, P44
[6]  
BENTLER PM, 1989, EOS STRUCTURAL EQUAT
[7]  
CHILTON MA, 2004, ACM SIGMIS DATABASE, V35, P88
[8]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[9]   STATISTICAL TESTS FOR MODERATOR VARIABLES - FLAWS IN ANALYSES RECENTLY PROPOSED [J].
CRONBACH, LJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1987, 102 (03) :414-417
[10]  
GREENHAUS JH, 1990, ACAD MANAGE J, V33, P64, DOI 10.5465/256352