A review of the in vitro activity of meropenem and comparative antimicrobial agents tested against 30,254 aerobic and anaerobic pathogens isolated world wide

被引:63
作者
Pfaller, MA
Jones, RN
机构
[1] Medical Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology, Univ. of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
[2] Medical Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology, Univ. of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0732-8893(97)00065-5
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The in vitro activity of meropenem (formerly SM-7738), a new carbapenem, was compared with that of imipenem and five other broad-spectrum antimicrobials (ceftazidime, cefotaxime, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin) against 30,254 clinically significant pathogens isolated in nine countries worldwide. Overall, the carbapenems, meropenem and imipenem, were the most active drugs. Meropenem was four- to 64-fold more active than imipenem against Gram-negative bacteria, including the Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis. Meropenem was also quite active against ceftazidine-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae, inhibiting 87.5 to 100% at less than or equal to 4 mu g/ml. In contrast, imipenem was four- to eight-fold more active than meropenem against Gram-positive species, including methicillin-susceptible strains of Straphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis. Among the anaerobes, strains resistant to meropenem or imipenem were encountered very rarely. These extensive data provide additional in vitro support for the clinical use of meropenem as a broad spectrum antimicrobial agent active against key pathogenic species of bacteria. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 163
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条