Impaired glucose tolerance and pregnancy outcome in Chinese women with high body mass index

被引:23
作者
Lao, TT
Ho, LF
机构
[1] Tsan Yuk Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
birthweight; body mass index; impaired glucose tolerance;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/15.8.1826
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
To determine if impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) impacts on the outcome of singleton pregnancies in Chinese women with a high (>26 kg/m(2)) body mass index (BMI), a retrospective case-control study was performed on 128 women with IGT and 128 controls with normal oral glucose tolerance test results, who were matched for pre-pregnancy BMI (within 0.1 kg/m(2)) and delivered within the same 3 year period, The IGT group was older, with more multiparae, a higher incidence of previous gestational diabetes mellitus, higher booking haemoglobin and fasting glucose concentrations, but no difference in the pre-pregnancy weight, gestational weight gain, or weight or BMI at delivery. There was no difference in the obstetric complications, mode of delivery, or the gestational age or mean infant birthweight. However, the birthweight ratio (relative to mean birthweight for gestation), incidence of large-for-gestational-age (birthweight >90th percentile) and macrosomic (birthweight greater than or equal to 4000 g) infants, and treatment for neonatal jaundice, were significantly higher in the IGT group. The results suggest that some of the complications attributed to gestational diabetes mellitus are probably related to maternal weight excess/obesity in the affected subjects, but IGT could still affect infant birthweight outcome despite diet treatment which has normalized gestational weight gain.
引用
收藏
页码:1826 / 1829
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Alberti KGMM, 1998, DIABETIC MED, V15, P539, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]  
ALGERT S, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V65, P487
[4]   DOES IMPAIRED GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE IMPLY A RISK IN PREGNANCY [J].
ALSHAWAF, T ;
MOGHRABY, S ;
AKIEL, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1988, 95 (10) :1036-1041
[5]   Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes [J].
Cnattingius, S ;
Bergström, R ;
Lipworth, L ;
Kramer, MS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (03) :147-152
[6]   Association between pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean delivery [J].
Crane, SS ;
Wojtowycz, MA ;
Dye, TD ;
Aubry, RH ;
Artal, R .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (02) :213-216
[7]  
Duthie S J, 1988, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, V28, P162, DOI 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1988.tb01654.x
[8]   Pregnancy complications and birth outcomes in obese and normal-weight women: Effects of gestational weight change [J].
Edwards, LE ;
Hellerstedt, WL ;
Alton, IR ;
Story, M ;
Himes, JH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (03) :389-394
[9]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF DIABETES AND PREGNANCY IN THE US, 1988 [J].
ENGELGAU, MM ;
HERMAN, WH ;
SMITH, PJ ;
GERMAN, RR ;
AUBERT, RE .
DIABETES CARE, 1995, 18 (07) :1029-1033
[10]  
GALTIERDEREURE F, 1995, INT J OBESITY, V19, P443