Molecular indicators of tree migration capacity under rapid climate change

被引:457
作者
McLachlan, JS
Clark, JS
Manos, PS
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Biol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Program Ecol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
climate change; molecular markers; paleoecology; range expansion;
D O I
10.1890/04-1036
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Recent models and analyses of paleoecological records suggest that tree populations are capable of rapid migration when climate warms. Fossil pollen is commonly interpreted as suggesting that the range of many temperate tree species expanded at rates of 100-1000 m/yr during the early Holocene. We used chloroplast DNA surveys to show that the geography of postglacial range expansion in two eastern North American tree species differs from that expected from pollen-based reconstructions and from patterns emerging from European molecular studies. Molecular evidence suggests that American beech (Fagus grandifolia) and red maple (Acer rubrum) persisted during the late glaciation as low-density populations, perhaps within 500 km of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Because populations were closer to modern range limits than previously thought, postglacial migration rates may have been slower than those inferred from fossil pollen. Our estimated rates of < 100 m/yr are consistent with model predictions based on life history and dispersal data, and suggest that past migration rates were substantially slower than the rates that will be needed to track 21st-century warming.
引用
收藏
页码:2088 / 2098
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]   The importance of plant macrofossils in the reconstruction of Lateglacial vegetation and climate: examples from Scotland, western Norway, and Minnesota, USA [J].
Birks, HH .
QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2003, 22 (5-7) :453-473
[4]  
Braun EmmaLucy., 1950, Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America
[5]   The spread of deciduous Quercus throughout Europe since the last glacial period [J].
Brewer, S ;
Cheddadi, R ;
de Beaulieu, JL ;
Reille, M .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 156 (1-3) :27-48
[6]  
Burns R.M., 1990, AGR HDB USDA FOREST, V2
[7]   Estimating population spread: What can we forecast and how well? [J].
Clark, JS ;
Lewis, M ;
McLachlan, JS ;
HilleRisLambers, J .
ECOLOGY, 2003, 84 (08) :1979-1988
[8]   Reid's paradox of rapid plant migration - Dispersal theory and interpretation of paleoecological records [J].
Clark, JS ;
Fastie, C ;
Hurtt, G ;
Jackson, ST ;
Johnson, C ;
King, GA ;
Lewis, M ;
Lynch, J ;
Pacala, S ;
Prentice, C ;
Schupp, EW ;
Webb, T ;
Wyckoff, P .
BIOSCIENCE, 1998, 48 (01) :13-24
[9]   Fecundity of trees and the colonization-competition hypothesis [J].
Clark, JS ;
LaDeau, S ;
Ibanez, I .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2004, 74 (03) :415-442
[10]   Why trees migrate so fast: Confronting theory with dispersal biology and the paleorecord [J].
Clark, JS .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1998, 152 (02) :204-224