Working with pluralism-determining quality in qualitative research

被引:105
作者
Easterby-Smith, Mark [1 ]
Golden-Biddle, Karen [2 ]
Locke, Karen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Sch Management, Lancaster LA1 4YW, England
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Management, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Coll William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187 USA
关键词
qualitative research methods; pluralism; journal editors; faculty development; criteria of quality;
D O I
10.1177/1094428108315858
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This Feature Topic contains four articles that address the determination of quality in qualitative research by exploring the use of criteria from the perspective of reviewers, editors, and/or authors. In this introductory article, the authors assert that these explorations represent an important move away from employing listings of static criteria to adjudicate and develop qualitative research. In its place, we see the making of quality as situated in methodological pluralism that occurs both in comparison with quantitative research and also within qualitative research. This fact complicates and enriches the task of determining quality and also suggests ways forward for the academic community.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 429
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条