The effect of wetland mitigation banking on the achievement of no-net-loss

被引:63
作者
Brown, PH
Lant, CL [1 ]
机构
[1] So Illinois Univ, Dept Geog, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
[2] USA, Corps Engineers, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
关键词
mitigation banking; wetlands; army corps of engineers; no-net-loss;
D O I
10.1007/s002679900190
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study determines whether the 68 wetland mitigation banks in existence in the United States through 1 January 1996 are achieving no-net-loss of wetland acreage nationally and regionally Although 74% of the individual banks achieve no-net-loss by acreage, overall, wetland mitigation banks are projected to result in a net loss of 21,328 acres of wetlands nationally, 52% of the acreage in banks. as already credited wetland acreages are converted to other uses. While most wetland mitigation banks are using appropriate compensation methods and ratios, several of the largest banks use preservation or enhancement, instead of restoration or creation. Most of these preservation/enhancement banks use minimum mitigation ratios of 1:1, which is much lower than ratios given in current guidelines. Assuming that mitigation occurs in these banks as preservation at the minimum allowable ratio, ten of these banks, concentrated in the western Gulf Coast region, will account for over 99% of projected net wetland acreage loss associated with banks. We conclude that wetland mitigation banking is a conceptually sound environmental policy and planning tool, but only if applied according to recently issued guidelines that ensure no-net-loss of wetland functions and values. Wetland mitigation banking inevitably leads to geographic relocation of wetlands, and therefore changes, either positively or negatively, the functions they perform and ecosystem services they provide.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 345
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] ADAMS PR, 1983, FHWAIP8224 US DEP TR, V2
  • [2] DEVELOPING THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR ASSESSING CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF WETLAND LOSS AND DEGRADATION ON LANDSCAPE FUNCTIONS - STATUS, PERSPECTIVES, AND PROSPECTS
    BEDFORD, BL
    PRESTON, EM
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1988, 12 (05) : 751 - 771
  • [3] Black, 1996, WATERSHED HYDROLOGY
  • [4] Brumbaugh R., 1994, NATL WETLAND MITIGAT
  • [5] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260
  • [6] Dahl T. E., 1991, Wetlands, Status and Trends in the Conterminous United States Mid-1970's to Mid-1980's
  • [7] Forman RTT., 1986, LANDSCAPE ECOL
  • [8] LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION IN A FORESTED WETLAND WATERSHED - CAN WE MANAGE CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
    GOSSELINK, JG
    SHAFFER, GP
    LEE, LC
    BURDICK, DM
    CHILDERS, DL
    LEIBOWITZ, NC
    HAMILTON, SC
    BOUMANS, R
    CUSHMAN, D
    FIELDS, S
    KOCH, M
    VISSER, JM
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 1990, 40 (08) : 588 - 600
  • [9] GRAVES GR, 1995, PURSUING EXCELLENCE
  • [10] HART MJ, 1995, ROCK PROD, V98, P34