Analyzing motorists' responses to temporary signage in highway work zones

被引:24
作者
Bai, Yong [1 ]
Finger, Kris [1 ]
Li, Yue [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
Crash; Motorist; Safety; Signage; Work zone;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2009.08.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
For decades, the importance of highway work zone safety has increased considerably with the continual increase in the number of highway work zones present on highways for repairs and expansion. Rural work zones on two-lane highways are particularly hazardous and cause a significant safety concern due to the disruption of regular traffic flow. In this study, researchers determined motorists' responses to warning signs in rural, two-lane highway work zones. The researchers divided vehicles into three classes (passenger car, truck, and semitrailer) and compared the mean change in speed of these classes based on three different sign setups: portable changeable message sign (PCMS) OFF, PCMS ON with the message of Slow Down. Drive Safety, and a temporary traffic sign (W20-1, "Road Work Ahead"). Field experiments were conducted on two two-lane work zones with flagger control. Statistical analyses were performed to determine whether there was a significant interaction between motorists' responses and the sign setups. Data analysis results show that a visible PCMS, either turned on or off, was most effective in reducing truck speeds in rural, two-lane work zones. The temporary traffic sign (W20-1) was more effective in reducing the vehicle speeds of passenger car and semitrailer. Results of this research project will help traffic engineers to better design the two-lane work zone setup and take necessary safety countermeasures to prevent vehicle crashes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 221
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
*AASHTO, 1987, SUMM REP WORK ZON CR
[2]  
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2004, AASHTO GREEN BOOK PO
[3]   Multivariate analysis of truck drivers' assessment of work zone safety [J].
Benekohal, RF ;
Shim, E .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1999, 125 (05) :398-406
[4]  
Brewer MA, 2006, TRANSPORT RES REC, P67
[5]   Analysis of fatal crashes in Georgia work zones [J].
Daniel, J ;
Dixon, K ;
Jared, D .
WORK ZONE SAFETY; PAVEMENT MARKING RETROREFLECTIVITY: MAINTENANCE, 2000, (1715) :18-23
[6]  
*FHWA, 2003, MAN UN TRAFF CONTR D
[7]  
Garber N.J., 2002, Crash Characteristics at Work Zones
[8]  
GARBER NJ, 1994, 95R4 VTRC
[9]  
GARBER NJ, 1998, 98R10 VTRC
[10]  
HARGROVES BT, 1981, TRANSPORT ENG-J ASCE, V107, P525