Impact of using triclosan-antibacterial sutures on incidence of surgical site infection

被引:99
作者
Galal, Ibrahim [1 ]
El-Hindawy, Khaled [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Surgical site infection; Antimicrobial triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 suture; Length of hospital stay; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection is a common complication of surgery. Its morbidities range from delayed healing to systemic sepsis. It has impact on the economy and health care resources. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled multicenter study aimed to compare triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 sutures with polyglactin 910 sutures for the reduction of surgical site infections. This article details the results from the Cairo University center. A total of 450 patients who had undergone different surgical procedures were enrolled; 230 were enrolled in the study group and 220 were enrolled in the control group. RESULTS: The study group and the control group were comparable regarding risk factors for surgical site infection. Surgical site infection incidence was 7% in the study group and 15% in the control group (P = .011). The mean extended stay as a result of infection was 3.71 days, with an average cost $91 US per day. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 antimicrobial suture lead to reduction of surgical site infection and has an impact on saving health care resources. The triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 antimicrobial suture could save $1,517,727 yearly in this single center. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 138
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Relationship between triclosan and susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from hands in the community [J].
Aiello, AE ;
Marshall, B ;
Levy, SB ;
Della-Latta, P ;
Larson, E .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2004, 48 (08) :2973-2979
[2]
ALTEMEIER WA, 1982, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V117, P107
[3]
[Anonymous], CIRURG PEDIAT
[4]
[Anonymous], SURG INFECT S1
[5]
Barbolt Thomas A, 2002, Surg Infect (Larchmt), V3 Suppl 1, pS45, DOI 10.1089/sur.2002.3.s1-45
[6]
Barie PS, 2002, Surg Infect (Larchmt), V3, P9, DOI 10.1089/10962960260496307
[7]
BERARD F, 1964, Ann Surg, V160, P1
[8]
Infection in surgical patients: Effects on mortality, hospitalization, and postdischarge care [J].
DiPiro, JT ;
Martindale, RG ;
Bakst, A ;
Vacani, PF ;
Watson, P ;
Miller, MT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1998, 55 (08) :777-781
[9]
Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: Can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination? [J].
Edmiston, Charles E. ;
Seabrook, Gary R. ;
Goheen, Michael P. ;
Krepel, Candace J. ;
Johnson, Christopher P. ;
Lewis, Brian D. ;
Brown, Kellie R. ;
Towne, Jonathan B. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 203 (04) :481-489
[10]
Fleck T, 2007, ANN THORAC SURG, V84, P2139