Human chromosome fragility

被引:152
作者
Lukusa, T. [1 ]
Fryns, J. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louvain, Ctr Human Genet, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
来源
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS | 2008年 / 1779卷 / 01期
关键词
rare fragile site; common fragile site; CCG/CGG trinucleotide repeat; AT-rich minisatellite repeat; dynamic mutation; DNA torsional flexibility;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbagrm.2007.10.005
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Fragile sites are heritable specific chromosome loci that exhibit an increased frequency of gaps, poor staining, constrictions or breaks when chromosomes are exposed to partial DNA replication inhibition. They constitute areas of chromatin that fail to compact during mitosis. They are classified as rare or common depending on their frequency within the population and are further subdivided on the basis of their specific induction chemistry into different groups differentiated as folate sensitive or non-folate sensitive rare fragile sites, and as aphidicolin, bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) or 5-azacytidine inducible common fragile sites. Most of the known inducers of fragility share in common their potentiality to inhibit the elongation of DNA replication, particularly at fragile site loci. Seven folate sensitive (FRA 10A, FRA11B, FRA12A, FRA16A, FRAXA, FRAXE and FRAXF) and two non-folate sensitive (FRA10B and FRA 1613) fragile sites have been molecularly characterized. All have been found to represent expanded DNA repeat sequences resulting from a dynamic mutation involving the normally occurring polymorphic CCG/CGG trinucleotide repeats at the folate sensitive and AT-rich minisatellite repeats at the non-folate sensitive fragile sites. These expanded repeats were demonstrated, first, to have the potential, under certain conditions, to form stable secondary non-B DNA structures (intra-strand hairpins, slipped strand DNA or tetrahelical structures) and to present highly flexible repeat sequences, both conditions which are expected to affect the replication dynamics, and second, to decrease the efficiency of nucleosome assembly, resulting in decondensation defects seen as fragile sites. Thirteen aphidicolin inducible common fragile sites (FRA2G, FRA3B, FRA4F, FRA6E, FRA6F, FRA7E, FRA7G, FRA7H, FRA71, FRA8C, FRA9E, FRA16D and FRAXB) have been characterized at a molecular level and found to represent relatively AT-rich DNA areas, but without any expanded repeat motifs. Analysis of structural characteristics of the DNA at some of these sites (FRA2G, FRA3B, FRA6F, FRA7E, FRA7G, FRA7H, FRA71, FRA16D and FPAXB) showed that they contained more areas of high DNA torsional flexibility with more highly AT-dinucleotide-rich islands than neighbouring non-fragile regions. These islands were shown to have the potential to form secondary non-B DNA structures and to interfere with higher-order chromatin folding. Therefore, a common fragility mechanism, characterized by high flexibility and the potential to form secondary structures and interfere with nucleosome assembly, is shared by all the cloned classes of fragile sites. From the clinical point of view, the folate sensitive rare fragile site FRAXA is the most important fragile site as it is associated with the fragile X syndrome, the most common form of familial mental retardation, affecting about 1/4000 males and 1/6000 females. Mental retardation in this syndrome is considered as resulting from the abolition of the FMR1 gene expression due to hypermethylation of the gene CpG islands adjacent to the expanded methylated trinucleotide repeat. FRAXE is associated with X-linked non-specific mental retardation, and FRA11B with Jacobsen syndrome. There is also some evidence that fragile sites, especially common fragile sites, are consistently involved in the in vivo chromosomal rearrangements related to cancer, whereas the possible implication of common fragile sites in neuropsychiatric and developmental disorders is still poorly documented. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 16
页数:14
相关论文
共 209 条
[1]   DNA-SEQUENCE PREFERENCES OF SEVERAL AT-SELECTIVE MINOR-GROOVE BINDING LIGANDS [J].
ABUDAYA, A ;
BROWN, PM ;
FOX, KR .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1995, 23 (17) :3385-3392
[2]  
ALDAZ CM, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, P3976
[3]  
Allingham-Hawkins SJ, 1999, AM J MED GENET, V83, P322, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990402)83:4<322::AID-AJMG17>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-B
[5]   Molecular characterization of FRAXB and comparative common fragile site instability in cancer cells [J].
Arlt, MF ;
Miller, DE ;
Beer, DG ;
Glover, TW .
GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 2002, 33 (01) :82-92
[6]   Examination of factors associated with instability of the FMR1 CGG repeat [J].
Ashley-Koch, AE ;
Robinson, H ;
Glicksman, AE ;
Nolin, SL ;
Schwartz, CE ;
Brown, WT ;
Turner, G ;
Sherman, SL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 63 (03) :776-785
[7]   Flexible DNA: Genetically unstable CTG center dot CAG and CGG center dot CCG from human hereditary neuromuscular disease genes [J].
Bacolla, A ;
Gellibolian, R ;
Shimizu, M ;
Amirhaeri, S ;
Kang, S ;
Ohshima, K ;
Larson, JE ;
Harvey, SC ;
Stollar, BD ;
Wells, RD .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 272 (27) :16783-16792
[8]   A NEW FOLATE SENSITIVE FRAGILE SITE AT 1P21.3 [J].
BAKER, E ;
SUTHERLAND, GR .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1991, 28 (05) :356-357
[9]  
Bednarek AK, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P2140
[10]  
BERG JM, 1969, LANCET, V1, P531