Secondhand smoke exposure in adulthood and risk of lung cancer among never smokers:: A pooled analysis of two large studies

被引:110
作者
Brennan, P [1 ]
Buffler, PA
Reynolds, P
Wu, AH
Wichmann, HE
Agudo, A
Pershagen, G
Jöckel, KH
Benhamou, S
Greenberg, RS
Merletti, F
Winck, C
Fontham, ETH
Kreuzer, M
Darby, SC
Forastiere, F
Simonato, L
Boffetta, P
机构
[1] Int Agcy Res Canc, Unit Environm Canc Epidemiol, F-69008 Lyon, France
[2] Venetian Canc Registry, Padua, Italy
[3] Epidemiol Unit Latium Reg, Rome, Italy
[4] Imperial Canc Res Fund, Oxford, England
[5] Louisiana State Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[6] Hosp Vianna do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
[7] Univ Turin, Ctr Oncol Prevent, Turin, Italy
[8] Univ Turin, CeRMS, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Turin, Italy
[9] Med Univ S Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[10] Natl Inst Hlth & Med Res, Paris, France
[11] Inst Med Informat Biometry Epidemiol, Essen, Germany
[12] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[13] Catalan Inst Oncol, Barcelona, Spain
[14] GSF, Inst Epidemiol, Munich, Germany
[15] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[16] Calif Dept Hlth Serv, Emeryville, CA USA
[17] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
lung cancer; secondhand smoke;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.11682
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The interpretation of the evidence linking exposure to secondhand smoke with lung cancer is constrained by the imprecision of risk estimates. The objective of the study was to obtain precise and valid estimates of the risk of lung cancer in never smokers following exposure to secondhand smoke, including adjustment for potential confounders and exposure misclassification. Pooled analysis of data from 2 previously reported large case-control studies was used. Subjects included 1,263 never smoking lung cancer patients and 2,740 population and hospital controls recruited during 1985-1994 from 5 metropolitan areas in the United States, 11 areas in Germany, Italy, Sweden, United Kingdom, France, Spain and Portugal. Odds ratios (ORs) of lung cancer were calculated for ever exposure and duration of exposure to secondhand smoke from spouse, workplace and social sources. The OR for ever exposure to spousal smoking was 1.18 (95% CI = 1.01-1.37) and for long-term exposure was 1.23 (95% CI = 1.01-1.51). After exclusion of proxy interviews, the OR for ever exposure from the workplace was 1.16 (95% CI = 0.99-1.36) and for long-term exposure was 1.27 (95% CI = 1.03-1.57). Similar results were obtained for exposure from social settings and for exposure from combined sources. A dose-response relationship was present with increasing duration of exposure to secondhand smoke for all 3 sources, with an OR of 1.32 (95% CI = 1.10-1.79) for the long-term exposure from all sources. There was no evidence of confounding by employment in high-risk occupations, education or low vegetable intake. Sensitivity analysis for the effects of misclassification (both positive and negative) indicated that the observed risks are likely to underestimate the true risk. Clear dose-response relationships consistent with a causal association were observed between exposure to secondhand smoke from spousal, workplace and social sources and the development of lung cancer among never smokers. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 131
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Ahrens W, 1998, Int J Occup Environ Health, V4, P236
  • [2] Boffetta P, 2002, SCAND J WORK ENV HEA, V28, P30
  • [3] Multicenter case-control study of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in Europe
    Boffetta, P
    Agudo, A
    Ahrens, W
    Benhamou, E
    Benhamou, S
    Darby, SC
    Ferro, G
    Fortes, C
    Gonzalez, CA
    Jöckel, KH
    Krauss, M
    Kreienbrock, L
    Kreuzer, M
    Mendes, A
    Merletti, F
    Nyberg, F
    Pershagen, G
    Poglabeln, H
    Riboli, E
    Schmid, G
    Simonato, L
    Trédaniel, J
    Whitley, E
    Wichmann, HE
    Winck, C
    Zambon, P
    Saracci, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (19) : 1440 - 1450
  • [4] BOFFETTA P, 2002, TXB CANC EPIDEMIOLOG, P248
  • [5] Environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality in a prospective study of Californians, 1960-98
    Enstrom, JE
    Kabat, GC
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7398): : 1057 - +
  • [6] NICOTINE CONCENTRATIONS IN URINE AND SALIVA OF SMOKERS AND NONSMOKERS
    FEYERABEND, C
    HIGENBOTTAM, T
    RUSSELL, MAH
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 284 (6321) : 1002 - 1004
  • [7] ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE AND LUNG-CANCER IN NONSMOKING WOMEN - A MULTICENTER STUDY
    FONTHAM, ETH
    CORREA, P
    REYNOLDS, P
    WUWILLIAMS, A
    BUFFLER, PA
    GREENBERG, RS
    CHEN, VW
    ALTERMAN, T
    BOYD, P
    AUSTIN, DF
    LIFF, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (22): : 1752 - 1759
  • [8] The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke
    Hackshaw, AK
    Law, MR
    Wald, NJ
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7114): : 980 - 988
  • [9] USE OF SERUM COTININE TO ASSESS THE ACCURACY OF SELF REPORTED NONSMOKING
    HADDOW, JE
    PALOMAKI, GE
    KNIGHT, GJ
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 293 (6557) : 1306 - 1306
  • [10] The short-term impact of national smoke-free workplace legislation on passive smoking and tobacco use
    Heloma, A
    Jaakkola, MS
    Kähkönen, E
    Reijula, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (09) : 1416 - 1418