A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, duloxetine-referenced, fixed-dose study of three dosages of Lu AA21004 in acute treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD)

被引:116
作者
Baldwin, David S. [1 ]
Loft, Henrik [2 ]
Dragheim, Marianne [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, Clin & Expt Sci Acad Unit, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[2] H Lundbeck & Co AS, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Dose finding; Duloxetine-referenced Lu AA21004; MADRS; Major depressive disorder; Placebo-controlled; RATING-SCALE; EFFICACY; MMRM; FOOD; LOCF;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.11.008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Lu AA21004 versus placebo, using duloxetine as active reference, in patients with DSM-IV-TR diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD) were evaluated in this 8-week, multi-site study. Patients (n=766) had a baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score >= 26 and were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to 2.5, 5 or 10 mg Lu AA21004, placebo, or 60 mg duloxetine. The 5 mg and 10 mg doses of Lu AA21004 were tested separately versus placebo at p <= 0.025 in a pre-specified order. In the pre-defined primary efficacy analysis [mean change from baseline in MADRS total score at Week 8, full analysis set, ANCOVA, last observation carried forward (LOCF)], the differences to placebo (n=145) of -1.7 (Lu AA21004 5 mg, n=155) and -1.5 points (Lu AA21004 10 mg, n=151) were not statistically significant; nor were those for Lu AA21004 2.5 mg (-1.4 points, n=155) or duloxetine (-2.0 points, n=149). Using mixed model, repeated measures (MMRM) analyses of the primary endpoint and most secondary endpoints were supportive of likely efficacy for Lu AA21004 5 mg and 10 mg and duloxetine. Treatment-emergent adverse events led to the withdrawal of 72 patients: 8% (placebo), 12% (duloxetine), and 6%, 11% and 9% in the Lu AA21004 groups (2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg, respectively). The most common adverse events were nausea, headache, dizziness, and dry mouth. No clinically relevant changes were seen in vital signs, weight, ECG, or laboratory results. In summary, none of the active treatment groups, including duloxetine, separated from placebo in the primary analysis in this 'failed' study. Findings on secondary outcome measures, using MMRM instead of LOCF, were supportive of likely efficacy for Lu AA21004 5 mg and 10 mg and duloxetine. Lu AA21004 (2.5, 5 and 10 mg) was well tolerated. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 491
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Prevention of relapse in generalized anxiety disorder by escitalopram treatment
    Allgulander, Christer
    Florea, Ioana
    Huusom, Anna K. Trap
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 9 (05) : 495 - 505
  • [2] A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, active reference study of Lu AA21004 in patients with major depressive disorder
    Alvarez, Enric
    Perez, Victor
    Dragheim, Marianne
    Loft, Henrik
    Artigas, Francesc
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 15 (05) : 589 - 600
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects
  • [4] [Anonymous], J CLIN PHARM
  • [5] [Anonymous], NOT GUID CLIN INV ME
  • [6] APA A.P. A., 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV, V4th
  • [7] Arbell M, 2011, EUR NEUROPSYCHOPHARM, V21, pS407
  • [8] Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-Dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): A Novel Multimodal Compound for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
    Bang-Andersen, Benny
    Ruhland, Thomas
    Jorgensen, Morten
    Smith, Garrick
    Frederiksen, Kristen
    Jensen, Klaus Gjervig
    Zhong, Huailing
    Nielsen, Soren Moller
    Hogg, Sandra
    Mork, Arne
    Stensbol, Tine Bryan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 54 (09) : 3206 - 3221
  • [9] Buchbjerg JK, 2009, J CLIN PHARMACOL, V49, P1119
  • [10] Guy W., 1976, CGI clinical global impressions