Randomized, double-blind comparison of once-weekly dalbavancin versus twice-daily linezolid therapy for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

被引:230
作者
Jauregui, LE
Babazadeh, S
Seltzer, E
Goldberg, L
Krievins, D
Frederick, M
Krause, D
Satilovs, I
Endzinas, Z
Breaux, J
O'Riordan, W
机构
[1] Vicuron Pharmaceut, King Of Prussia, PA 19406 USA
[2] St Vincent Mercy Med Ctr, Toledo, OH USA
[3] Crest Clin Trials, Anaheim, CA USA
[4] Talbert Med Grp, Huntington Beach, CA USA
[5] eStudy Site, Chula Vista, CA USA
[6] Gulf Coast Res Assoc, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[7] P Stradina Univ Hosp, Riga, Latvia
[8] Daugavpiils Reg Hosp, Daugavpils, Latvia
[9] Kaunas Med Univ Hosp, Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
D O I
10.1086/497271
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Dalbavancin, a novel lipoglycopeptide with a pharmacokinetic profile that allows weekly dosing, is active against gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA). The efficacy of dalbavancin for treatment of skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) was demonstrated in a phase 2 study. Methods. In a phase 3 noninferiority study, patients with complicated SSSIs, including infections known or suspected to involve MRSA, were randomized ( ratio, 2: 1) in a double-blind manner to receive dalbavancin ( 1000 mg given intravenously on day 1 and 500 mg given intravenously on day 8) or linezolid ( 600 mg given intravenously or intravenously/orally every 12 h for 14 days). Efficacy was assessed by determining clinical and microbiological responses at the end of therapy and at the test-of-cure visit. Relapses were identified by additional follow-up similar to 1 month later. Results. MRSA was identified in 51% of patients from whom a pathogen was isolated at baseline. Dalbavancin and linezolid demonstrated comparable clinical efficacy in the clinically evaluable population at the test-of-cure visit (88.9% and 91.2% success, respectively). The rate of clinical success at the end of therapy was > 90% in both arms. Less than 1.0% of patients in either treatment arm experienced relapse after the test-of-cure visit. Both treatments yielded successful microbiological response in excess of 85% among microbiologically evaluable patients at end of therapy and at the test-of-cure visit for all pathogens combined, for all S. aureus strains, and for MRSA. Gastrointestinal symptoms were among the most common adverse events in both arms. A higher proportion of patients in the linezolid arm reported adverse events that were judged by the investigator to be probably/possibly related to treatment (dalbavancin arm, 25.4% of subjects; linezolid arm, 32.2% of subjects). Conclusions. Two doses of dalbavancin ( 1000 mg given on day 1 followed by 500 mg given on day 8) were as well tolerated and as effective as linezolid given twice daily for 14 days for the treatment of patients with complicated SSSI, including those infected with MRSA.
引用
收藏
页码:1407 / 1415
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections [J].
Arbeit, RD ;
Maki, D ;
Tally, FP ;
Campanaro, E ;
Eisenstein, BI .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (12) :1673-1681
[2]   Update on emerging infections: News from the centers for disease control and prevention [J].
Barrett, TW ;
Moran, GJ .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 43 (01) :43-45
[3]   In-vitro and in-vivo antibacterial activity of BI 397, a new semi-synthetic glycopeptide antibiotic [J].
Candiani, G ;
Abbondi, M ;
Borgonovi, M ;
Romanò, G ;
Parenti, F .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 44 (02) :179-192
[4]  
*CECP NAT NOS INF, 2003, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V31, P481
[5]   The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus? [J].
Chambers, HF .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (02) :178-182
[6]   Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infection:: An emerging clinical problem [J].
Cohen, PR ;
Kurzrock, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 50 (02) :277-280
[7]   Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection [J].
Engemann, JJ ;
Carmeli, Y ;
Cosgrove, SE ;
Fowler, VG ;
Bronstein, MZ ;
Trivette, SL ;
Briggs, JP ;
Sexton, DJ ;
Kaye, KS .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 36 (05) :592-598
[8]   Efficacy of ertapenem against methicillin- susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in complicated skin/skin structure infections:: results of a double-blind clinical trial versus piperacillin-tazobactam [J].
Gesser, RM ;
McCarroll, KA ;
Woods, GL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2004, 23 (03) :235-239
[9]   Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitalized adults and children without known risk factors [J].
Gorak, EJ ;
Yamada, SM ;
Brown, JD .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 29 (04) :797-800
[10]   Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Gosbell, IB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 5 (04) :239-259