The Impact of the Nomination Stage on Gifted Program Identification: A Comprehensive Psychometric Analysis

被引:67
作者
McBee, Matthew T. [1 ]
Peters, Scott J. [2 ]
Miller, Erin M. [3 ]
机构
[1] E Tennessee State Univ, 413 Rogers Stout, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Whitewater, WI 53190 USA
[3] Bridgewater Coll, Bridgewater, VA 22812 USA
关键词
identification; nomination; psychometrics; sensitivity; ROC; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY EVIDENCE; SCORES; TESTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0016986216656256
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The use of the nomination stage as the first step in the identification process is pervasive across the field of gifted education. In many cases, nominations are used to limit the number of students who will need to be evaluated using costly and time-consuming assessments for the purpose of gifted program identification and placement. This study evaluated the effect of the nomination stage on the overall efficacy of a gifted identification system. Results showed that in nearly all conditions, identification systems that require a nomination before testing result in a large proportion of gifted students being missed. Under commonly implemented conditions, the nomination stage can cause the false negative rate to easily exceed 60%. Changes to identification practices are urgently needed in order to ensure that larger numbers of gifted students receive appropriate educational placement and to maintain the integrity of gifted education services.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 278
页数:21
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems
[2]  
[Anonymous], STAT STAT GIFT ED 20
[3]  
Aron A., 2013, STAT PSYCHOL, V6th
[4]  
Berman Kimberly., 2012, GIFTED CHILD TODAY, V35, P19, DOI DOI 10.1177/1076217511428307
[5]  
Callahan C.M., 2013, Status of elementary gifted programs
[6]   Stereotypes of Giftedness in Current and Future Educators [J].
Carman, Carol A. .
JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED, 2011, 34 (05) :790-812
[7]  
Crocker L., 2006, Introduction to classical and modern test theory, V1st
[8]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[9]   Teachers See What Ability Scores Cannot: Predicting Student Performance With Challenging Mathematics [J].
Foreman, Jennifer L. ;
Gubbins, E. Jean .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ACADEMICS, 2015, 26 (01) :5-23
[10]   STATISTICAL-MODELS AND SHOE LEATHER [J].
FREEDMAN, DA .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, 1991, 21 :291-313