An analysis of standardised patient checklist errors and their effect on student scores

被引:27
作者
Heine, N [1 ]
Garman, K
Wallace, P
Bartos, R
Richards, A
机构
[1] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Med, Clin Skills Euc Off, Loma Linda, CA 92350 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Curricular Resources & Evaluat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
education; medical; undergraduate; methods; clinical competence; medical history taking; standards; educational measurement; California;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01416.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background The frequency and nature of standardised patient (SP) recording errors during clinical performance examinations (CPX) have an effect on case scores and ultimately on pass/fail decisions. Purpose To determine the effect of SP recording errors on case scores. Methods Standardised patients completed checklists immediately after each encounter. To determine checklist accuracy, multiple reviewers developed a checklist key for each student encounter studied. The total errors, the net errors, the errors of commission and omission and error rates by competency skill were analysed. Results The frequency of errors in history taking was greater than in physical examination, and the majority of errors were made in the students' favour. Summing the errors of commission and omission decreased the effect of total errors on student scores. Conclusions High levels of SP recording accuracy are achievable. When errors occur, the net effect is usually in the students' favour.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 104
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   DETECTING AND CORRECTING FOR RATER-INDUCED DIFFERENCES IN STANDARDIZED PATIENT TESTS OF CLINICAL COMPETENCE [J].
ABRAHAMOWICZ, M ;
TAMBLYN, RM ;
RAMSAY, JO ;
KLASS, DK ;
KOPELOW, ML .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1990, 65 (09) :S25-S26
[2]  
CARROLL JG, 1981, J MED EDUC, V56, P522
[3]   Standardized patients' accuracy in recording examinees' behaviors using checklists [J].
DeChamplain, AE ;
Margolis, MJ ;
King, A ;
Klass, DJ .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1997, 72 (10) :S85-S87
[4]   EVALUATION OF PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION SKILLS - RELIABILITY OF FACULTY OBSERVERS AND PATIENT INSTRUCTORS [J].
ELLIOT, DL ;
HICKAM, DH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 258 (23) :3405-3408
[5]   Who should rate candidates in an objective structured clinical examination? [J].
Martin, JA ;
Reznick, RK ;
Rothman, A ;
Tamblyn, RM ;
Regehr, G .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (02) :170-175
[6]  
Morrison LJ., 1994, TEACH LEARN MED, V6, P23
[7]   THE SELECTION AND TRAINING OF EXAMINERS FOR CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS [J].
NEWBLE, DI ;
HOARE, J ;
SHELDRAKE, PF .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1980, 14 (05) :345-349
[8]  
Nieman L Z, 1988, Res Med Educ, V27, P154
[9]  
Perkowski-Rogers LC, 1994, TEACH LEARN MED, V6, P6, DOI DOI 10.1080/10401339409539636
[10]   AN OBJECTIVE-MEASURE OF CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE [J].
PETRUSA, ER ;
BLACKWELL, TA ;
ROGERS, LP ;
SAYDJARI, C ;
PARCEL, S ;
GUCKIAN, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 83 (01) :34-42