Add-on Salmeterol Compared to Double Dose Fluticasone in Pediatric Asthma: A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial (VIAPAED)

被引:42
作者
Gappa, Monika [1 ,2 ]
Zachgo, Wolfgang
von Berg, Andrea [2 ]
Kamin, Wolfgang [3 ]
Stern-Straeter, Catrin [4 ]
Steinkamp, Gratiana
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, D-3000 Hannover, Germany
[2] Marienhosp Wesel, Wesel, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Munich, Germany
[4] GlaxoSmithKline, Munich, Germany
关键词
asthma; child; asthma control; efficacy; comparison; inhaled corticosteroid; long-acting-beta-2-agonist; fluticasone; salmeterol; MU-G; COMBINATION THERAPY; CONTROLLER REGIMENS; PROPIONATE; CHILDREN; INHALER; CORTICOSTEROIDS; BECLOMETHASONE; PERSISTENCE; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1002/ppul.21120
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Rationale: In asthmatic children whose symptoms are uncontrolled on standard doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), guidelines recommend to either increase the ICS dose or to add further controller medication, e.g. a long acting beta 2-agonist (LABA). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of doubling the dose of ICS (fluticasone proprionate FP 200 mu g twice daily) with adding a long-acting beta-2 agonist to the ICS (SFC, salmeterol 50 mu g/FP 100 mu g twice daily) in children with uncontrolled asthma. Methods: Children between 4 and 16 years of age were eligible for this multicenter, randomized, double blind, double dummy, parallel-group study During a 14-day run-in phase, all children inhaled FP 100 mu g b.i.d. Patients with persistent symptoms on >= 7 of 14 dayswere randomized to 8 weeks treatment with a Diskus (R) containing either SFC 50 mu g/100 mu g b.i.d. or FP 200 mu g b.i.d.. The primary endpoint was the mean change in morning (a.m.) PEF from baseline. The initial statistical hypothesis of non-inferiority of SFC vs. FP was confirmed in an adaptive interim analysis, so that the study was terminated prematurely. Results: 441 patients from 39 centers entered the run-in phase, and 64% of these were randomized to treatment (N = 138 to SFC and N = 145 to FP). After 8 weeks, patients on SFC had significantly better results for primary and secondary endpoints: The mean increase in morning PEF was 30.4 +/- 34.1 L/min in the SFC group and 16.7 +/- 35.8 L/min in the fluticasone group, and the mean (95% CI) improvement from baseline a.m. PEF in the ITT group was significantly larger after SFC (+8.6 L/min, CI: [1.3; infinity]). Patients in the SFC group experienced 8.7% (CI: [1.2;16.3]) more days without asthma symptoms and 8.0% (CI: [0.6; 15.3]) more days without salbutamol than patients receiving FP Good asthma control was achieved for a longer period in the SFC (3.4 +/- 2.7 weeks) group than in the FP group (2.7 +/- 2.7, P = 0.02). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Asthma exacerbations were recorded in 3 and 6 and SAEs in 2 and 1 patients from the SFC and FP groups, respectively. Conclusions: In children with persistent asthma inadequately controlled on low dose ICS alone, adding a long acting beta-2-agonist to ICS in a single inhaler was more effective than doubling the ICS dose. These results support recommendations of adding LABA to low-dose ICS as the preferred controller option for children older than 4 years with symptomatic asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009; 44:1132-1142. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1132 / 1142
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   50 years of asthma: UK trends from 1955 to 2004 [J].
Anderson, H. Ross ;
Gupta, Ramyani ;
Strachan, David P. ;
Limb, Elizabeth S. .
THORAX, 2007, 62 (01) :85-90
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, GLOB STRAT ASTHM MAN
[3]   Scientific rationale for inhaled combination therapy with long-acting β2-agonists and corticosteroids [J].
Barnes, PJ .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2002, 19 (01) :182-191
[4]   MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF ANTIASTHMA THERAPY [J].
BARNES, PJ .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 1995, 27 (05) :531-535
[5]  
BENGOA R, 2003, WHOMNC0301
[6]  
Bergmann KC, 2004, SWISS MED WKLY, V134, P50
[7]   Efficacy and safety of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination delivered by the Diskus™or pressurised metered-dose inhaler in children with asthma [J].
Bracamonte, T ;
Schauer, U ;
Emeryk, A ;
Godwood, A ;
Balsara, S .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2005, 25 (01) :1-11
[8]  
DEBLIC J, 2009, PEDIAT ALLERGY IMMUN
[9]  
GUEVARA JP, 2006, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD003558.pub2, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003558.PUB2]
[10]   Adherence to prescribed treatment for asthma: Evidence from pharmacy benefits data [J].
Jones, C ;
Santanello, NC ;
Boccuzzi, SJ ;
Wogen, J ;
Strub, P ;
Nelsen, LM .
JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2003, 40 (01) :93-101