Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements to assess response to primary prophylaxis in patients with cirrhosis: a decision analytical study

被引:36
作者
Hicken, BL
Sharara, AI
Abrams, GA
Eloubeidi, M
Fallon, MB
Arguedas, MR
机构
[1] UAB, Ctr Liver, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01391.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient may identify a suboptimal response to beta-blockers in patients with varices at risk for bleeding. However, the cost-effectiveness of routine hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements to guide primary prophylaxis has not been examined. Methods: We used decision analysis to evaluate two hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement strategies relative to standard beta-blocker therapy in a hypothetical cohort of patients with high-risk varices: (i) hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement 4 weeks after the initiation of beta-blocker therapy; and (ii) hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement prior to and 4 weeks after the initiation of beta-blocker therapy. The total expected costs, variceal bleeding episodes and deaths were calculated over a 1-year time horizon. Results: Beta-blocker therapy was associated with total costs of $1464, seven variceal bleeding episodes, one variceal bleeding episode-related death and 15 deaths. One hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement was associated with total costs of $5015, four variceal bleeding episodes, one variceal bleeding episode-related death and 15 deaths. Two hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements were associated with total costs of $8657, four episodes of variceal bleeding, one variceal bleeding episode-related death and 15 deaths. Compared with beta-blocker therapy alone, the incremental costs per variceal bleeding episode prevented and death averted were, respectively, $108 185 and $355 100 (one hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement) and $202 796 and $719 300 (two hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements). The results were sensitive to the time horizon of the analysis, the probability of bleeding whilst on beta-blockers and the cost of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement. Conclusion: Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement to guide primary prophylaxis is an expensive strategy for reducing variceal bleeding or death, especially in patients with limited life expectancy, such as those with advanced, decompensated cirrhosis.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 153
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Propranolol plus prazosin compared with propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the treatment of portal hypertension [J].
Albillos, A ;
García-Pagán, JC ;
Iborra, J ;
Bandi, JC ;
Cacho, G ;
Pérez-Paramo, M ;
Escorsell, A ;
Calleja, JL ;
Escartin, P ;
Bosch, J .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 115 (01) :116-123
[2]   Effects of isosorbide-5-mononitrate compared with propranolol on first bleeding and long-term survival in cirrhosis [J].
Angelico, M ;
Carli, L ;
Piat, C ;
Gentile, S ;
Capocaccia, L .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 113 (05) :1632-1639
[3]   NEW APPROACHES IN THE PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF PORTAL-HYPERTENSION [J].
BOSCH, J ;
GARCIAPAGAN, JC ;
FEU, F ;
LUCA, A ;
FERNANDEZ, M ;
PIZCUETA, P ;
RODES, J .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 1993, 17 :S41-S45
[4]  
Brett BT, 2001, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, V13, P349, DOI 10.1097/00042737-200104000-00008
[5]   Cost effectiveness of coronary heart disease prevention strategies in adults [J].
Brown, AD ;
Garber, AM .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1998, 14 (01) :27-48
[6]   THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF VARICES [J].
BURROUGHS, AK .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 1993, 17 :S10-S13
[7]  
CONN HO, 1991, HEPATOLOGY, V13, P902, DOI 10.1002/hep.1840130517
[8]   Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: An evidence-based approach [J].
D'Amico, G ;
Pagliaro, L ;
Bosch, J .
SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE, 1999, 19 (04) :475-505
[9]  
De BK, 2000, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V95, P2023
[10]  
Drummond M., 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO, V4