The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: A prospective, randomized study

被引:78
作者
Demiraran, Yavuz
Korkut, Esin
Tamer, Ali
Yorulmaz, Ilknur
Kocaman, Buket
Sezen, Gulbin
Akcan, Yusuf
机构
[1] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Konuralp Duzce, Turkey
[2] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Konuralp Duzce, Turkey
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY | 2007年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
dexmedetomidine; endoscopy; midazolam; sedation;
D O I
10.1155/2007/350279
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the present prospective, randomized study was to investigate and compare the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in providing sedation for gastroscopy. A total of 50 adult patients (25 patients receiving dexmedetomidine and 25 patients receiving midazolam), 18 to 60 years of age, and rated I and II on the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system were included. A brief questionnaire was used to collect demographic data; patients were asked to rate anxiety, satisfaction wit care to data and expected discomfort on a visual analogue scale. The following parameters were measured continuously and recorded every minute; heart rate, mean arterial pressure, hemoglobin oxygen saturation and respiratory rate. The two groups were similar with regard to age, body mass index, sex, education, duration of endoscopy, and ethanol or tobacco use. After the procedure, full recovery time, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and hemoglobin oxygen saturation levels were similar in both groups. Both groups also had low levels of perceived procedural gagging, discomfort and anxiety scores (P > 0.05), and high satisfaction levels (90.1+/-3.0 for dexmedetomidine versus 84.9+/-4.5 for midazolam; P>0.05). Retching and endoscopist satisfaction were significantly different in patient receiving dexmedetomidine versus those receiving midazolam (88.8+/-6.5 versus 73.5+/-16.4, P<0.05; and 20.6+/-4.4 versus 45.2+/-6.0; P<0.001). In the midazolam group, the number of patients who had adverse effects was higher than the dexmedetomidine group (P<0.05). As a result, dexmedetomidine performed as effectively and safely as midazolam when used as a sedative in upper gastroscopy; it was superior to midazolam with regard to retching, rate of side effects and endoscopist satisfaction. It was concluded that dexmedetomidine may be a good alternative to midazolam to sedate patients for upper endoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 29
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   ALPHA2-ADRENERGIC AGENTS IN ANESTHESIA [J].
AANTAA, R ;
SCHEININ, M .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 37 (05) :433-448
[2]   A patient education program is cost-effective for preventing failure of endoscopic procedures in a gastroenterology department [J].
Abuksis, G ;
Mor, M ;
Segal, N ;
Shemesh, I ;
Morad, I ;
Plaut, S ;
Weiss, E ;
Sulkes, J ;
Fraser, G ;
Niv, Y .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 96 (06) :1786-1790
[3]   The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation [J].
Arain, SR ;
Ebert, TJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (02) :461-466
[4]   RESULTS FROM THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY UNITED-STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION COLLABORATIVE STUDY ON COMPLICATION RATES AND DRUG-USE DURING GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
ARROWSMITH, JB ;
GERSTMAN, BB ;
FLEISCHER, DE ;
BENJAMIN, SB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (04) :421-427
[5]   Dexmedetomidine and awake fiberoptic intubation for possible cervical spine myelopathy - A clinical series [J].
Avitsian, R ;
Lin, J ;
Lotto, M ;
Ebrahim, Z .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 17 (02) :97-99
[6]   Premedication, preparation, and surveillance [J].
Bell, GD .
ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (01) :2-12
[7]   EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN HUMANS .1. SEDATION, VENTILATION, AND METABOLIC-RATE [J].
BELLEVILLE, JP ;
WARD, DS ;
BLOOR, BC ;
MAZE, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (06) :1125-1133
[8]   Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperldine/fentanyl, and midazolam [J].
Cohen, LB ;
Hightower, CD ;
Wood, DA ;
Miller, KM ;
Aisenberg, J .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (07) :795-803
[9]   A comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-dose epidural tramadol versus morphine in children [J].
Demiraran, Y ;
Kocaman, B ;
Akman, RY .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (04) :510-513
[10]   CONSCIOUS SEDATION FOR GASTROSCOPY - PATIENT TOLERANCE AND CARDIORESPIRATORY PARAMETERS [J].
FROEHLICH, F ;
SCHWIZER, W ;
THORENS, J ;
KOHLER, M ;
GONVERS, JJ ;
FRIED, M .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (03) :697-704