Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments

被引:113
作者
Gigone, D [1 ]
Hastie, R [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV COLORADO,DEPT PSYCHOL,BOULDER,CO 80309
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.149
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Modern societies rely heavily on groups to make important economic and political decisions. However, a review of research on group processes shows that progress has been slow in the delineation of the conditions that promote or impede efficient, accurate group judgments. One reason for the slow progress is that research methods and data analysis in this area are varied, difficult to compare, and often substandard. In this review, the authors summarize alternate methods of analysis and provide detailed illustrations of the best methods for assessing and analyzing group judgment accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 167
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], UNDERSTANDING GROUP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1968, Formal representation of human judgment
[3]  
[Anonymous], UNDERSTANDING GROUP
[4]  
ASHTON AH, 1985, ACCOUNT REV, V60, P173
[5]  
BREHMER B, 1988, ADV PSYCHOL, V54
[6]  
Brown R., 1986, Social psychology, V2nd
[7]  
COHEN J, 1994, AM PSYCHOL, V49, P997, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.50.12.1103
[8]   GENERALIZED MULTIVARIATE LENS MODEL ANALYSIS FOR COMPLEX HUMAN INFERENCE TASKS [J].
COOKSEY, RW ;
FREEBODY, P .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 35 (01) :46-72
[9]   QUALITY OF GROUP JUDGMENT [J].
EINHORN, HJ ;
HOGARTH, RM ;
KLEMPNER, E .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1977, 84 (01) :158-172
[10]   THE COMMON KNOWLEDGE EFFECT - INFORMATION SHARING AND GROUP JUDGMENT [J].
GIGONE, D ;
HASTIE, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 65 (05) :959-974