Prediction of intestinal absorption:: comparative assessment of GASTROPLUS ™ and IDEA ™

被引:112
作者
Parrott, N [1 ]
Lavé, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Div Pharmaceut, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
ADME; oral absorption; physiologically based pharmacokinetics; simulation; modeling;
D O I
10.1016/S0928-0987(02)00132-X
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We have assessed two commercial software tools employing physiologically based models for prediction of intestinal absorption in human. IDEA(TM) 2.0 and GASTROPLUS(TM) 3.1.0 were compared both in their ability to predict fraction absorbed for a set of 28 drugs and in terms of the functionality offered. The emphasis was placed on the practical usefulness to pharmaceutical drug discovery. Predictions were assessed for three levels of input data (i) pure in silico input, (ii) thermodynamic solubility and in silico permeability, (iii) thermodynamic solubility and human colon carcinoma cell line (CACO-2) permeability. We found the pure in silico prediction ability of the tools to be comparable with 70% correct classification rate. With measured input data the IDEA(TM) prediction rate improved to 79% while GASTROPLUS(TM) stayed at 70%. In terms of functionality GASTROPLUS(TM) is a powerful system for the trained user. Open access to model parameters, diagnostic tools and the ability to integrate data make it particularly suitable for the later stages of discovery and development. IDEA(TM) is web based and presents a simple interface suitable for widespread use with minimal training. However the limited functionality and inconvenient handling of multiple compound batches currently restrict the usefulness of version 2.0 for drug discovery. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 61
页数:11
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Predicting the impact of physiological and biochemical processes on oral drug bioavailability [J].
Agoram, B ;
Woltosz, WS ;
Bolger, MB .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2001, 50 :S41-S67
[2]   Caco-2 monolayers in experimental and theoretical predictions of drug transport [J].
Artursson, P ;
Palm, K ;
Luthman, K .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 1996, 22 (1-2) :67-84
[3]  
Dollery C., 1998, THERAPEUTIC DRUGS
[4]  
GOODMAN LS, 1999, GOODMAN GILMANS PHAR
[5]   Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic simulation modelling [J].
Grass, GM ;
Sinko, PJ .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2002, 54 (03) :433-451
[6]  
GRASS GM, 1997, ADV DRUG DELIV REV, V23, P190
[7]  
LEESMAN G, AAPS 2000
[8]   Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings [J].
Lipinski, CA ;
Lombardo, F ;
Dominy, BW ;
Feeney, PJ .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 1997, 23 (1-3) :3-25
[9]   Development of predictive pharmacokinetic simulation models for drug discovery [J].
Norris, DA ;
Leesman, GD ;
Sinko, PJ ;
Grass, GM .
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2000, 65 (1-2) :55-62
[10]   PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION BY THE 7 UK-OWNED PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES (1964-1985) [J].
PRENTIS, RA ;
LIS, Y ;
WALKER, SR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 25 (03) :387-396