Comparison of the intraocular pressure-lowering effect of latanoprost and timolol in patients with chronic angle closure glaucoma - A preliminary study

被引:39
作者
Aung, T
Wong, HT
Yip, CC
Leong, JYN
Chan, YH
Chew, PTK [1 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[3] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Clin Trials & Epidemiol Res Unit, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00073-7
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-reducing effect and side effects of 0.005% latanoprost once daily to 0.5% timolol twice daily in patients with primary chronic angle closure glaucoma (CACG). Design: Randomized, double-masked two-center clinical trial. Participants: Thirty-two Asian patients with CACG, defined as glaucomatous optic neuropathy with a compatible visual field defect and at least 6 clock hours of synechial angle closure on gonioscopy were recruited. All patients had previous peripheral iridotomy (PI) with IOP >21 mmHg after PI and were thereafter controlled (IOP <22 mmHg) with one or two pressure-reducing drugs. Intervention: After a washout period, the patients were randomized to a 2-week treatment period with either placebo in the morning and 0.005% latanoprost in the evening or 0.5% timolol twice daily. Main Outcome Measures: The short-term IOP reduction of latanoprost and timolol in patients with CACG, IOP was measured at baseline, and after 2, 7, and 14 days of treatment. In addition, the short-term ocular and systemic adverse events of the two drugs were evaluated. Results: Thirty patients completed the study. Two patients in the timolol group were withdrawn because of inadequate IOP control. Compared with baseline, the IOP after 2 weeks of treatment was statistically significantly reduced by 8.8 +/- 1.1 mmHg (mean +/- SEM, P < 0.001) in the latanoprost group, and by 5.7 +/- 0.9 mmHg (P < 0.001) in the timolol group, The difference in IOP reduction between the two treatment groups was 3.1 +/- 1.5 mm Hg in favor of latanoprost (P = 0.04). The main ocular adverse events reported in both treatment groups were conjunctival hyperemia and discomfort. Conclusions: In this preliminary study, a significantly greater IOP reduction was achieved with 0.005% latanoprost once daily compared with 0.5% timolol twice daily in patients with CACG, The results suggest that latanoprost may be a therapeutic choice for the medical treatment of primary CACG. Ophthalmology 2000;107: 1178-1183 (C) 2000 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1183
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   LATANOPROST ADMINISTERED ONCE-DAILY CAUSED A MAINTAINED REDUCTION OF INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE IN GLAUCOMA PATIENTS TREATED CONCOMITANTLY WITH TIMOLOL [J].
ALM, A ;
WIDENGARD, I ;
KJELLGREN, D ;
SODERSTROM, M ;
FRISTROM, B ;
HEIJL, A ;
STJERSCHANTZ, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 79 (01) :12-16
[2]   Effects on intraocular pressure and side effects of 0.005% latanoprost applied once daily, evening or morning - A comparison with timolol [J].
Alm, A ;
Stjernschantz, J ;
Widengard, I ;
Linden, C ;
Soderstrom, M ;
Nilsson, SE ;
Fristrom, B ;
Lindblom, B ;
Heijl, A ;
Gundersen, KG ;
Ehinger, B ;
Holmin, C ;
BengtssonStigmar, E ;
Aasved, H ;
Jangard, P ;
Ringvold, A ;
Vegge, T ;
Halseide, R ;
LundAndersen, H ;
Flesner, P ;
Thygesen, J ;
Airaksinen, J ;
Tuulonen, A .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 102 (12) :1743-1752
[3]   Latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, for glaucoma therapy - Efficacy and safety after 1 year of treatment in 198 patients [J].
Camras, CB ;
Alm, A ;
Watson, P ;
Stjernschantz, J ;
Aasved, H ;
Jangard, P ;
LundAndersen, H ;
Flesner, P ;
Soderstrom, M ;
Ehinger, B ;
Holmin, C ;
BengtssonStigmar, E ;
Heijl, A ;
Gundersen, KG ;
Airaksinen, J ;
Tuulonen, A ;
Halseide, R ;
Lindblom, B ;
Ringvold, A ;
Vegge, T ;
Linden, C ;
Nilsson, SE ;
Fristrom, B ;
Widengard, I ;
Thygesen, J ;
Green, F ;
Valenzuela, F ;
Potts, M ;
Spencer, I ;
Coakes, R ;
Reynolds, P ;
Mills, B ;
Chatterjee, A ;
Nagasubramanian, S ;
Roxburgh, S ;
Sanders, R ;
Bailey, M ;
Whyte, IF ;
Vernon, S ;
Sloper, M ;
Murray, S ;
Davey, C ;
HickmanCasey, J ;
Longstaff, S ;
Currie, Z ;
Wishart, P ;
Austin, M ;
Birch, M ;
Elkington, A ;
Luff, A .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 103 (11) :1916-1924
[4]   Comparison of latanoprost and timolol in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma - A six-month, masked, multicenter trial in the United States [J].
Camras, CB ;
Cioffi, GA ;
VanBuskirk, EM ;
Fraser, J ;
Stewart, WC ;
Stewart, JA ;
Lustgarten, J ;
Schumer, RA ;
Podos, SM ;
Arroyo, M ;
Nitzberg, S ;
Ritch, R ;
Abundo, G ;
Caronia, R ;
Liebmann, J ;
Steinberger, D ;
Krupin, T ;
Rosenberg, LF ;
Ruderman, JM ;
Clarkson, K ;
Weinreb, RN ;
Ochabsi, R ;
Sherwood, M ;
Smith, MF ;
Stokes, DW ;
Zam, ZS ;
Wilensky, J ;
Hillman, D ;
Kaplan, B ;
Gates, V ;
Nail, C ;
Zimmerman, T ;
Fechtner, R ;
Fenton, R ;
Fenton, J ;
Higginbotham, EJ ;
Johnson, AT ;
PollackRundle, CJ ;
Weiss, E ;
Yablonski, ME ;
Tannenbaum, MH ;
Ibrahim, F ;
Ohia, E ;
Neely, D ;
Minckler, D ;
Heuer, D ;
Lee, P ;
Padea, M ;
Kaufman, PL ;
Heatley, GA .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 103 (01) :138-147
[5]   ISSUES IN THE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND POPULATION-BASED SCREENING OF PRIMARY ANGLE-CLOSURE GLAUCOMA [J].
CONGDON, N ;
WANG, F ;
TIELSCH, JM .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 36 (06) :411-423
[6]   The effect of latanoprost 0.005% once daily versus 0.0015% twice daily on intraocular pressure and aqueous humour protein concentration in glaucoma patients. A randomized, double-masked comparison with timolol 0.5% [J].
Diestelhorst, M ;
Roters, S ;
Krieglstein, GK .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 235 (01) :20-26
[7]   Glaucoma in Mongolia - A population-based survey in Hovsgol Province, Northern Mongolia [J].
Foster, PJ ;
Baasanhu, J ;
Alsbirk, PH ;
Munkhbayar, D ;
Uranchimeg, D ;
Johnson, GJ .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 114 (10) :1235-1241
[8]  
HOTEHAMA Y, 1993, JPN J OPHTHALMOL, V37, P270
[9]   Effects on IOP restoration and blood-aqueous barrier after long term treatment with latanoprost in open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension [J].
Linden, C ;
Nuija, E ;
Alm, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 81 (05) :370-372
[10]   A comparison of latanoprost and timolol in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension - A 12-week study [J].
Mishima, HK ;
Masuda, K ;
Kitazawa, Y ;
Azuma, I ;
Araie, M .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 114 (08) :929-932