DQE(f) of an amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector: Detector parameter influences and measurement methodology

被引:48
作者
Granfors, PR [1 ]
Aufrichtig, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Perkin Elmer Amorphous Silicon, GE Med Syst, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING | 2000年 / 3977卷
关键词
amorphous silicon; flat panel; detector; detective quantum efficiency; digital radiography;
D O I
10.1117/12.384481
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
We discuss how the frequency dependent detective quantum efficiency (DQE(f)) in a well-designed amorphous silicon flat panel detector is affected by several phenomena that reduce the DQE in other types of medical imaging detectors. The detector examined employs a CsI(T1) scintillator and is designed for general diagnostic x-ray imaging applications. We consider DQE degradation due to incomplete x-ray absorption, secondary quantum noise, Swank factor, Lubberts effect, spatial variation in gain, noise aliasing, and additive system noise. The influences of detector design parameters on the frequency- and exposure-dependent DQE are also examined. We find that the DQE does not depend directly on MTF and that DQE is independent of exposure within the detector's operating range, except at the lowest exposures. Likewise the signal per absorbed x-ray, which contains the fill factor as one of several multiplicative components, does not affect DQE except at the lowest exposures. A methodology for determining DQE(f) from measurements of MTF(f), noise power spectrum (NPS), average signal, and x-ray exposure is presented. We find that it is important to incorporate several corrections in the NPS measurement procedure in order to obtain accurate results. These include corrections for lag, nonlinearity, response variation from pixel to pixel, and use of a finite number of flat-field images. MTF, NPS, and DQE results are presented for a 41 x 41-cm(2) flat panel detector designed for radiographic applications.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 13
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   New CsI/a-Si 17" x 17" X-ray flat panel detector provides superior detectivity and immediate direct digital output for General Radiography systems [J].
Chaussat, C ;
Chabbal, J ;
Ducourant, T ;
Spinnler, V ;
Vieux, G ;
Neyret, R .
PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 3336 :45-56
[2]   A PHYSICAL IMAGE QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIGITAL SPOT FLUOROGRAPHY SYSTEM [J].
COWEN, AR ;
WORKMAN, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1992, 37 (02) :325-342
[3]   A SPATIAL-FREQUENCY DEPENDENT QUANTUM ACCOUNTING DIAGRAM AND DETECTIVE QUANTUM EFFICIENCY MODEL OF SIGNAL AND NOISE-PROPAGATION IN CASCADED IMAGING-SYSTEMS [J].
CUNNINGHAM, IA ;
WESTMORE, MS ;
FENSTER, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (03) :417-427
[4]   Degradation of the detective quantum efficiency due to a non-unity detector fill factor [J].
Cunningham, IA .
PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING - MEDICAL IMAGING 1997, 1997, 3032 :22-31
[5]  
CUNNINGHAM IA, 1997, EXPANDING ROLE MED P, pCH9
[6]   DQE(F) OF 4 GENERATIONS OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY ACQUISITION DEVICES [J].
DOBBINS, JT ;
ERGUN, DL ;
RUTZ, L ;
HINSHAW, DA ;
BLUME, H ;
CLARK, DC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (10) :1581-1593
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF THE SPATIAL WIENER SPECTRUM OF NONSTORAGE IMAGING DEVICES [J].
DRANGOVA, M ;
ROWLANDS, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (02) :151-157
[8]  
FU T, 1984, THESIS U ARIZONA
[9]   Performance characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat panel X-ray imaging detector [J].
Granfors, PR .
MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 :480-490
[10]  
GRANFORS PR, UNPUB MED PHYSICS