Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things

被引:143
作者
Bapteste, Eric [1 ]
O'Malley, Maureen A. [2 ]
Beiko, Robert G. [3 ]
Ereshefsky, Marc [4 ]
Gogarten, J. Peter [5 ]
Franklin-Hall, Laura [6 ]
Lapointe, Francois-Joseph [7 ]
Dupre, John [2 ]
Dagan, Tal [8 ]
Boucher, Yan [9 ]
Martin, William [8 ]
机构
[1] UPMC, UMR CNRS 7138, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] Univ Exeter, ESRC Ctr Genom Soc Egenis, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Comp Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Philosophy, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Connecticut, Dept Mol & Cell Biol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[6] NYU, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY 10003 USA
[7] Univ Montreal, Dept Sci Biol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[8] Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Bot, D-4000 Dusseldorf, Germany
[9] MIT, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
HORIZONTAL GENE-TRANSFER; PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS; DETECTING RECOMBINATION; GENOME SEQUENCE; BACTERIAL PHYLOGENY; CHIMERIC NATURE; DNA-SEQUENCES; CORE; NETWORKS; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6150-4-34
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
090105 [作物生产系统与生态工程];
摘要
Background: The concept of a tree of life is prevalent in the evolutionary literature. It stems from attempting to obtain a grand unified natural system that reflects a recurrent process of species and lineage splittings for all forms of life. Traditionally, the discipline of systematics operates in a similar hierarchy of bifurcating (sometimes multifurcating) categories. The assumption of a universal tree of life hinges upon the process of evolution being tree-like throughout all forms of life and all of biological time. In multicellular eukaryotes, the molecular mechanisms and species-level population genetics of variation do indeed mainly cause a tree-like structure over time. In prokaryotes, they do not. Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things, and we need to treat them as such, rather than extrapolating from macroscopic life to prokaryotes. In the following we will consider this circumstance from philosophical, scientific, and epistemological perspectives, surmising that phylogeny opted for a single model as a holdover from the Modern Synthesis of evolution. Results: It was far easier to envision and defend the concept of a universal tree of life before we had data from genomes. But the belief that prokaryotes are related by such a tree has now become stronger than the data to support it. The monistic concept of a single universal tree of life appears, in the face of genome data, increasingly obsolete. This traditional model to describe evolution is no longer the most scientifically productive position to hold, because of the plurality of evolutionary patterns and mechanisms involved. Forcing a single bifurcating scheme onto prokaryotic evolution disregards the non-tree-like nature of natural variation among prokaryotes and accounts for only a minority of observations from genomes. Conclusion: Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things. Hence we will briefly set out alternative models to the tree of life to study their evolution. Ultimately, the plurality of evolutionary patterns and mechanisms involved, such as the discontinuity of the process of evolution across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide, summons forth a pluralistic approach to studying evolution. Reviewers: This article was reviewed by Ford Doolittle, John Logsdon and Nicolas Galtier.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1999, Phylogenetic systematics
[2]
[Anonymous], 2006, EVOLUTION GENETIC EX
[3]
ARCHIBALD JD, 2008, J HIST BIOL
[4]
The Puzzle of Plastid Evolution [J].
Archibald, John M. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) :R81-R88
[5]
Three ambitious (and rather unorthodox) assignments for the field of biodiversity genetics [J].
Avise, John C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 :11564-11570
[6]
Split Decomposition: A New and Useful Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis of Distance Data [J].
Bandelt, Hans-Juergen ;
Dress, Andreas W. M. .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 1992, 1 (03) :242-252
[7]
BANDELT HJ, 1995, GENETICS, V141, P743
[8]
BANDELT HJ, 1989, B MATH BIOL, V51, P133, DOI 10.1016/S0092-8240(89)80053-9
[9]
Alternative methods for concatenation of core genes indicate a lack of resolution in deep nodes of the prokaryotic phylogeny [J].
Bapteste, E. ;
Susko, E. ;
Leigh, J. ;
Ruiz-Trillo, I. ;
Bucknam, J. ;
Doolittle, W. F. .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2008, 25 (01) :83-91
[10]
Baroni Mihaela, 2005, Ann. Comb., V8, P391