Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MDCT and MRI for Identifying the Severity and Cause of Neural Foraminal Stenosis in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Prospective Study

被引:15
作者
Douglas-Akinwande, Annette C. [1 ]
Rydberg, Jonas [1 ]
Shah, Mitesh V. [2 ]
Phillips, Michael D. [3 ]
Caldemeyer, Karen S. [1 ]
Lurito, Joseph T. [4 ]
Ying, Jun [5 ]
Mathews, Vincent P. [6 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Eastern Radiologists Inc, Greenville, NC USA
[5] Inst Study Hlth, Cincinnati, OH USA
[6] NW Radiol Network, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
cervical radiculopathy; contrast material; CT degenerative disease; disk herniation; neural foraminal stenosis; DISK HERNIATION; CT-MYELOGRAPHY; SPINE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.09.2988
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of IV contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI for evaluation of the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis in patients with cervical radiculopathy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Eighteen patients with cervical radiculopathy prospectively underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans were acquired at 1-mm thickness and reconstructed in oblique axial (parallel to disk) and sagittal (perpendicular to neural foramen) 2-mm sections without a gap. The MRI sequences used were sagittal T1-weighted, fast spin-echo T2-weighted, 3D fast spin-echo T2-weighted, axial T2-weighted, and 3D gradient-recalled echo. Three neuroradiologists independently and blindly rated the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis on a 4-point scale. Using the same scale at surgery, one of three surgeons rated the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis, and the results were used as the reference standard. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement (kappa) was calculated. RESULTS. For severity of neural foraminal stenosis, the sensitivities of contrast-enhanced MDCT (50/55, 91%) and MRI (55/57, 96%) were similar, as were their specificities (contrast-enhanced MDCT, 13/24, 54%; MRI, 11/24, 46%). For cause of neural foraminal stenosis, the accuracies of contrast-enhanced MDCT (46/54, 85%) and MRI (45/57, 79%) were similar. Interobserver agreement on severity of neural foraminal stenosis was moderate to almost perfect for contrast-enhanced MDCT (kappa = 0.50-1.00) and MRI (kappa = 0.43-1.00). For cause of neural foraminal stenosis, interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial for contrast-enhanced MDCT (kappa = 0.52-0.76) but only fair for MRI (kappa = 0.23-0.39). Intra-observer agreement was very high for severity of neural foraminal stenosis (contrast-enhanced MDCT, kappa = 0.85; MRI, kappa = 0.80) and cause of neural foraminal stenosis (contrast-enhanced MDCT, kappa = 0.86; MRI, kappa = 1.00). CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced MDCT is as accurate as MRI in evaluation of the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis and may have better interobserver agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 61
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
BALERIAUX D, 1983, AM J NEURORADIOL, V4, P607
[2]
Bartlett RJV, 1996, NEURORADIOLOGY, V38, P142
[3]
A comparison of T2 and gadolinium enhanced MRI with CT myelography in cervical radiculopathy [J].
Bartlett, RJV ;
Hill, CR ;
Gardiner, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (841) :11-19
[4]
Multichannel CT: Evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware [J].
Douglas-Akinwande, Annette C. ;
Buckwalter, Kenneth A. ;
Rydberg, Jonas ;
Rankin, James L. ;
Choplin, Robert H. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 :S97-U107
[5]
CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY [J].
ELLENBERG, MR ;
HONET, JC ;
TREANOR, WJ .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1994, 75 (03) :342-352
[6]
HEINZ ER, 1984, AM J NEURORADIOL, V5, P621
[7]
Ilkko E, 1996, ACTA RADIOL, V37, P148
[8]
Imaging of the cervical spine [J].
Kaiser, JA ;
Holland, BA .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (24) :2701-2712
[9]
KRAUSE D, 1985, J NEURORADIOLOGY, V12, P271
[10]
LARSSON EM, 1989, ACTA RADIOL, V30, P233