Comparison of refractometers and test endpoints in the measurement of serum protein concentration to assess passive transfer status in calves

被引:114
作者
Calloway, CD [1 ]
Tyler, JW [1 ]
Tessman, RK [1 ]
Hostetler, D [1 ]
Holle, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Coll Vet Med, Dept Vet Med & Surg, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2002年 / 221卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.2460/javma.2002.221.1605
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 [兽医学];
摘要
Objective-To evaluate 3 refractometers for detection of failure of passive transfer (FPT) of immunity in calves, and assess the effect of refractometric test endpoints on sensitivity, specificity, and proportion of calves classified correctly with regard to passive transfer status. Design-Prospective study. Animals-90 calves. Procedure-Blood samples were obtained from calves that were < 10 days old. Serum IgG concentration was determined by use of a radial immunodiffusion assay. Accuracy of 3 refractometers in the prediction of serum IgG concentration was determined by use of standard epidemiologic methods and a linear regression model. Results-At a serum protein concentration test endpoint of 5.2 g/dL, sensitivity of each refractometer was 0.89 or 0.93, and specificity ranged from 0.80 to 0.91. For all refractometers, serum protein concentration test endpoints of 5.0 or 5.2 g/dL resulted in sensitivity > 0.80, specificity > 0.80, and proportion of calves classified correctly > 0.85. Serum protein concentrations equivalent to 1,000 mg of IgG/dL of serum were 4.9, 4.8, and 5.1 g/dL for the 3 refractometers. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-The refractometers, including a nontemperature-compensating instrument, performed similarly in detection of FPT. Serum protein concentration test endpoints of 5.0 and 5.2 g/dL yielded accurate results in the assessment of adequacy of passive transfer; lower or higher test endpoints misclassified larger numbers of calves.
引用
收藏
页码:1605 / 1608
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Daniel WW, 1999, BIOSTATISTICS, P400
[2]
Evaluation of a commercially available immunoassay for assessing adequacy of passive transfer in calves [J].
Dawes, ME ;
Tyler, JW ;
Hostetler, D ;
Lakritz, J ;
Tessman, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 220 (06) :791-793
[3]
EFFECTS OF PASSIVE-IMMUNITY ON SUBSEQUENT PRODUCTION IN DAIRY HEIFERS [J].
DENISE, SK ;
ROBISON, JD ;
STOTT, GH ;
ARMSTRONG, DV .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1989, 72 (02) :552-554
[4]
ASSESSING EFFICIENCY OF PASSIVE IMMUNE TRANSFER IN DAIRY HERDS [J].
HANCOCK, DD .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1985, 68 (01) :163-183
[5]
Holloway NM, 2002, J VET INTERN MED, V16, P187, DOI 10.1892/0891-6640(2002)016&lt
[6]
0187:SIGCIC&gt
[7]
2.3.CO
[8]
2
[9]
Hudgens KAR, 1996, AM J VET RES, V57, P1711
[10]
Prediction of serum IgG1 concentration in Holstein calves using serum gamma glutamyltransferase activity [J].
Parish, SM ;
Tyler, JW ;
Besser, TE ;
Gay, CC ;
Krytenberg, D .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 11 (06) :344-347