Machine Learning Solutions for Osteoporosis-A Review

被引:126
作者
Smets, Julien [1 ]
Shevroja, Enisa [1 ]
Hugle, Thomas [2 ]
Leslie, William D. [3 ]
Hans, Didier [1 ]
机构
[1] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Bone & Joint Dept, Ctr Bone Dis, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
OSTEOPOROSIS; FRACTURE PREDICTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; MACHINE LEARNING; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; NEURAL-NETWORK; HIP FRACTURE; COMPRESSION FRACTURES; VERTEBRAL FRACTURES; USERS GUIDES; X-RAY; DEEP;
D O I
10.1002/jbmr.4292
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Osteoporosis and its clinical consequence, bone fracture, is a multifactorial disease that has been the object of extensive research. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) have enabled the field of artificial intelligence (AI) to make impressive breakthroughs in complex data environments where human capacity to identify high-dimensional relationships is limited. The field of osteoporosis is one such domain, notwithstanding technical and clinical concerns regarding the application of ML methods. This qualitative review is intended to outline some of these concerns and to inform stakeholders interested in applying AI for improved management of osteoporosis. A systemic search in PubMed and Web of Science resulted in 89 studies for inclusion in the review. These covered one or more of four main areas in osteoporosis management: bone properties assessment (n = 13), osteoporosis classification (n = 34), fracture detection (n = 32), and risk prediction (n = 14). Reporting and methodological quality was determined by means of a 12-point checklist. In general, the studies were of moderate quality with a wide range (mode score 6, range 2 to 11). Major limitations were identified in a significant number of studies. Incomplete reporting, especially over model selection, inadequate splitting of data, and the low proportion of studies with external validation were among the most frequent problems. However, the use of images for opportunistic osteoporosis diagnosis or fracture detection emerged as a promising approach and one of the main contributions that ML could bring to the osteoporosis field. Efforts to develop ML-based models for identifying novel fracture risk factors and improving fracture prediction are additional promising lines of research. Some studies also offered insights into the potential for model-based decision-making. Finally, to avoid some of the common pitfalls, the use of standardized checklists in developing and sharing the results of ML models should be encouraged. (c) 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)..
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 851
页数:19
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]
Abu Marar RF, 2020, ENG TECHNOL APPL SCI, V10, P6027
[2]
Computer vs human: Deep learning versus perceptual training for the detection of neck of femur fractures [J].
Adams, Matthew ;
Chen, Weijia ;
Holcdorf, David ;
McCusker, Mark W. ;
Howe, Piers D. L. ;
Gaillard, Frank .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 63 (01) :27-32
[3]
Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models Users' Guides to the Medical Literature [J].
Alba, Ana Carolina ;
Agoritsas, Thomas ;
Walsh, Michael ;
Hanna, Steven ;
Iorio, Alfonso ;
Devereaux, P. J. ;
McGinn, Thomas ;
Guyatt, Gordon .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (14) :1377-1384
[4]
Deep Learning With Electronic Health Records for Short-Term Fracture Risk Identification: Crystal Bone Algorithm Development and Validation [J].
Almog, Yasmeen Adar ;
Rai, Angshu ;
Zhang, Patrick ;
Moulaison, Amanda ;
Powell, Ross ;
Mishra, Anirban ;
Weinberg, Kerry ;
Hamilton, Celeste ;
Oates, Mary ;
McCloskey, Eugene ;
Cummings, Steven R. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (10)
[5]
End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography [J].
Ardila, Diego ;
Kiraly, Atilla P. ;
Bharadwaj, Sujeeth ;
Choi, Bokyung ;
Reicher, Joshua J. ;
Peng, Lily ;
Tse, Daniel ;
Etemadi, Mozziyar ;
Ye, Wenxing ;
Corrado, Greg ;
Naidich, David P. ;
Shetty, Shravya .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2019, 25 (06) :954-+
[6]
Early diagnosis of osteoporosis using radiogrammetry and texture analysis from hand and wrist radiographs in Indian population [J].
Areeckal, A. S. ;
Jayasheelan, N. ;
Kamath, J. ;
Zawadynski, S. ;
Kocher, M. ;
David S., S. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 29 (03) :665-673
[7]
Arun N., ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV, V2020
[8]
Evaluation of low bone mass and prediction of fracture risk using metacarpal radiogrammetry method: a comparative study with DXA and X-ray phantom [J].
Ashok Kumar, Devaraj ;
Anburajan, Mariamicheal ;
Snekhalatha, Umapathy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2018, 21 (07) :1350-1371
[9]
Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables [J].
Badgeley, Marcus A. ;
Zech, John R. ;
Oakden-Rayner, Luke ;
Glicksberg, Benjamin S. ;
Liu, Manway ;
Gale, William ;
McConnell, Michael, V ;
Percha, Bethany ;
Snyder, Thomas M. ;
Dudley, Joel T. .
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2019, 2 (1)
[10]
Big Data and Machine Learning in Health Care [J].
Beam, Andrew L. ;
Kohane, Isaac S. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (13) :1317-1318