Predicting 90-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Spinal Metastatic Disease: Development and Internal Validation

被引:145
作者
Karhade, Aditya V. [1 ]
Thio, Quirina C. B. S. [1 ]
Ogink, Paul T. [1 ]
Bono, Christopher M. [1 ]
Ferrone, Marco L. [2 ]
Oh, Kevin S. [3 ]
Saylor, Philip J. [4 ]
Schoenfeld, Andrew J. [2 ]
Shin, John H. [5 ]
Harris, Mitchel B. [1 ]
Schwab, Joseph H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Orthoped Surg, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Orthoped Surg, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Hematol Oncol, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Neurosurg, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Machine learning; 90-day; 1-year; Prognosis; Spine metastasis; Survival; Explanation; SCORING SYSTEM; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; MODELS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/neuros/nyz070
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: Increasing prevalence of metastatic disease has been accompanied by increasing rates of surgical intervention. Current tools have poor to fair predictive performance for intermediate (90-d) and long-term (1-yr) mortality. OBJECTIVE: To develop predictive algorithms for spinal metastatic disease at these time points and to provide patient-specific explanations of the predictions generated by these algorithms. METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted at 2 large academic medical centers to identify patients undergoing initial operative management for spinal metastatic disease between January 2000 and December 2016. Five models (penalized logistic regression, random forest, stochastic gradient boosting, neural network, and support vector machine) were developed to predict 90-d and 1-yr mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 732 patients were identified with 90-d and 1-yr mortality rates of 181 (25.1%) and 385 (54.3%), respectively. The stochastic gradient boosting algorithm had the best performance for 90-d mortality and 1-yr mortality. On global variable importance assessment, albumin, primary tumor histology, and performance status were the 3 most important predictors of 90-d mortality. The final models were incorporated into an open access web application able to provide predictions as well as patient-specific explanations of the results generated by the algorithms. The application can be found at https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/spinemetssurvival/ CONCLUSION: Preoperative estimation of 90-d and 1-yr mortality was achieved with assessment of more flexible modeling techniques such as machine learning. Integration of these models into applications and patient-centered explanations of predictions represent opportunities for incorporation into healthcare systems as decision tools in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:E671 / E681
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
Predicting survival for metastatic spine disease: a comparison of nine scoring systems [J].
Ahmed, A. Karim ;
Goodwin, C. Rory ;
Heravi, Amir ;
Kim, Rachel ;
Abu-Bonsrah, Nancy ;
Sankey, Eric ;
Kerekes, Daniel ;
Ramos, Rafael De la Garza ;
Schwab, Joseph ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (10) :1804-1814
[2]
SURVIVAL AFTER SURGERY FOR SPINAL AND EXTREMITY METASTASES - PROGNOSTICATION IN 241 PATIENTS [J].
BAUER, HCF ;
WEDIN, R .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 66 (02) :143-146
[3]
Bihorac A, 2018, ANN SURG
[4]
Prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with symptomatic spinal bone metastases: a retrospective cohort study of 1 043 patients [J].
Bollen, Laurens ;
van der Linden, Yvette M. ;
Pondaag, Willem ;
Fiocco, Marta ;
Pattynama, Bas P. M. ;
Marijnen, Corrie A. M. ;
Nelissen, Rob G. H. H. ;
Peul, Wilco C. ;
Dijkstra, P. D. Sander .
NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (07) :991-998
[5]
Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[6]
Brier Glenn W, 1950, Monthly Weather Review, V78, P1, DOI DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078ANDLT
[7]
0001:VOFEITANDGT
[8]
2.0.CO
[9]
2
[10]
Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.7326/M14-0698]