A comparative study of fuzzy rough sets

被引:863
作者
Radzikowska, Anna Maria [1 ]
Kerre, Etienne E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Technol, Fac Math & Informat Sci, Pl Politech 1, PL-00661 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Fuzzy set theory; Rough set theory; Fuzzy implicator; Fuzzy rough set;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-0114(01)00032-X
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The notion of a rough set was originally proposed by Pawlak (1982). Later on, Dubois and Prade (1990) introduced fuzzy rough sets as a fuzzy generalization of rough sets. In this paper, we present a more general approach to the fuzzification of rough sets. Specifically, we define a broad family of fuzzy rough sets, each one of which, called an (I, T)-fuzzy rough set, is determined by an implicator I and a triangular norm T. Basic properties of fuzzy rough sets are investigated. In particular, we define three classes of fuzzy rough sets, relatively to three main classes of implicators well known in the literature, and analyse their properties in the context of basic rough equalities. Finally, we refer to an operator-oriented characterization of rough sets as proposed by Lin and Liu (1994) and show soundness of this axiomatization for the Lukasiewicz fuzzy rough sets. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 155
页数:19
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, INTRO BASIC PRINCIPL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Note on multiple-valued logic in japan
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, INCOMPLETE INFORM RO
[4]   ROUGH FUZZY-SETS AND FUZZY ROUGH SETS [J].
DUBOIS, D ;
PRADE, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 1990, 17 (2-3) :191-209
[5]  
Dubois D., 1992, INTELLIGENT DECISION, P203, DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7975-9_14
[6]  
Klir G. J., 1995, FUZZY LOGIC THEORY A
[7]  
Lin T.Y., 1995, P CSC 96 WORKSH ROUG
[8]  
Nachtegael M, 1998, FUZZY LOGIC AND INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY, P29
[9]  
Orlowska E, 1998, SYNTH LIBR, V273, P283
[10]   Many-valuedness and uncertainty [J].
Orlowska, E .
27TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC - 1997 PROCEEDINGS, 1997, :153-158