Comparison of two methods for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament using a computer based method: quantitative evaluation of laxity, three-dimensional kinematics and ligament deformation measurement in cadaver knees

被引:22
作者
Hagemeister, N
Duval, N
Yahia, LH
Krudwig, W
Witzel, U
de Guise, JA
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Hop Notre Dame, Ctr Rech, Lab Rech Imagerie & Orthoped,LIO, Montreal, PQ H2L 4M1, Canada
[2] Ecole Polytech, Grp Rech Biomecan Biomat, GRBB, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada
[3] Marien Hosp, Erwitte, Germany
[4] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Forsch Grp Biomech, D-4630 Bochum, Germany
[5] Ecole Technol Super, Lab Imagerie Vis & Intelligence Artificielle, LIVIA, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
three-dimensional knee kinematics; posterior cruciate ligament; surgical reconstruction; artificial ligaments; trevira; lars; laxity;
D O I
10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00044-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this paper is to present a biomechanical comparison of two different methods for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament in cadaver knees. We used an original computer-based method allowing precise calculation of three-dimensional (3D) knee kinematic parameters as well as the estimation of combined graft deformation (elongation-flexion-torsion). After isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) dissection, double bundle and 'over-the-bottom' methods were performed successively on each knee using synthetic polyester ligaments. The effect of pre-tensioning was tested with the 'over-the-bottom' method. antero-posterior (A-P) and rotational laxity as well as 3D kinematics were recorded and analysed. Our computer based method allowed us to show that both reconstruction methods were equivalent in restoring A-P and rotational laxity as well as kinematic curves. Combined deformation of the prostheses was equivalent for both ligaments. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
BUESS E, 1993, ARTHROSKOPIE, V6, P218
[2]
CURRENT CONCEPTS REVIEW - INJURIES OF THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT [J].
COVEY, DC ;
SAPEGA, AA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (09) :1376-1386
[3]
DEJOUR H, 1988, FR J ORTHOP SURG, V2, P112
[4]
THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT ARTHROSCOPIC EVALUATION AND TREATMENT [J].
FANELLI, GC ;
GIANNOTTI, BF ;
EDSON, CJ .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 1994, 10 (06) :673-688
[5]
Friederich N, 1995, ARTHROSKOPIE, V8, P53
[6]
TORSION AND BENDING IMPOSED ON A NEW ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT PROSTHESIS DURING KNEE FLEXION - AN EVALUATION METHOD [J].
GELY, P ;
DROUIN, G ;
THIRY, PS ;
TREMBLAY, GR .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1984, 106 (04) :285-294
[7]
THE ROLE OF THE POSTEROLATERAL AND CRUCIATE LIGAMENTS IN THE STABILITY OF THE HUMAN KNEE - A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY [J].
GOLLEHON, DL ;
TORZILLI, PA ;
WARREN, RF .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 69A (02) :233-242
[8]
Hagemeister N, 2002, BIO-MED MATER ENG, V12, P47
[9]
Krudwig W K, 1996, Unfallchirurgie, V22, P49
[10]
Krudwig W.K., 1997, LIGAMENTS LIGAMENTOP, P245