Context Matters: Explaining How and Why Mobilizing Context Influences Motivational Dynamics

被引:105
作者
van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien [1 ]
Klandermans, Bert
van Dijk, Wilco W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, FSW Sociol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Social Psychol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
COLLECTIVE ACTION; PARTICIPATION; PROTEST;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01626.x
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The emphasis in the social-psychological collective action literature is on why individuals take part in collective action; however, it does not elaborate on how different mobilizing contexts may appeal to distinct motivational dynamics to participate. The present study connects the microlevel of motivational dynamics of individual protesters with the mesolevel of social movement characteristics. To do so a field study was conducted. Protesters were surveyed in the act of protesting in two different demonstrations in two different town squares simultaneously organized by two social movements at exactly the same time against the same budget cuts proposed by the same government. But with one fundamental difference, the movements emphasized different aspects of the policies proposed by the government. This most similar systems design created a unique natural experiment, which enabled the authors to examine whether the motivational dynamics of individual protesters are moderated by the social movement context. Previous research suggested an instrumental path to collective action, and the authors added an ideology path. The authors expected and found that power-oriented collective action appeals to instrumental motives and efficacy and that value-oriented collective action appeals to ideological motives, and, finally, that efficacy mediates on instrumental motives and motivational strength, but only so in power-oriented action.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 838
页数:24
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Understanding human values
[3]   Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment [J].
Benford, RD ;
Snow, DA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 26 :611-639
[4]  
Blackwood L., 2003, Journal of Industrial Relations, V45, P485, DOI 10.1111/j.0022-1856.2003.00095.x
[5]  
Broadbent J., 2003, Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action
[6]  
DEWITTE H, 1995, TIJDSCHRIFT ARBEIDSV, V11, P261
[7]  
DIANI M, PROTEST POL IN PRESS
[8]  
FEATHER N T, 1982, Motivation and Emotion, V6, P217, DOI 10.1007/BF00992246
[9]   Rational choice and the dynamics of collective political action: Evaluating alternative models with panel data [J].
Finkel, SE ;
Muller, EN .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1998, 92 (01) :37-49
[10]   Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness [J].
Hornsey, Matthew J. ;
Blackwood, Leda ;
Louis, Winnifred ;
Fielding, Kelly ;
Mavor, Ken ;
Morton, Thomas ;
O'Brien, Anne ;
Paasonen, Karl-Erik ;
Smith, Joanne ;
White, Katherine M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 36 (07) :1701-1722