Nonresponse in the american time use survey - Who is missing from the data and how much does it matter?

被引:144
作者
Abraham, Katharine G. [1 ]
Maitland, Aaron [1 ]
Bianchi, Suzanne M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/poq/nfl037
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article examines nonresponse in a large government survey, the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), which interviews persons in households previously interviewed in the Current Population Survey. The response rate for the ATUS has been below 60 percent for the first two years of its existence, raising questions about whether the results can be generalized to the target population. The article begins with an analysis of the types of nonresponse encountered in the ATUS. Noncontact accounts for roughly 60 percent of ATUS nonresponse, with refusals accounting for roughly 40 percent. We find little support for the hypothesis that busy people are less likely to respond to the ATUS but find considerable support for the hypothesis that people who are weakly integrated into their communities are less likely to respond, mostly because they are less likely to be contacted. When we compare aggregate estimates of time use calculated using the ATUS base weights without any adjustment for nonresponse, estimates calculated using the ATUS final weights with a nonresponse adjustment, and estimates calculated using weights that incorporate our own nonresponse adjustment based on a propensity model, we find some modest differences, but the three sets of estimates are broadly similar. The article ends with suggestions for further research and analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 703
页数:28
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Abraham K.G., 2005, MARKET DESIGNING NON
[2]  
ABRAHAM KG, 2006, UNPUB EFFECTS SURVEY
[3]  
American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2006, STAND DEF FIN DISP C, V4th
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Journal of Official Statistics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, SURV METHODOL
[6]   The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment [J].
Curtin, R ;
Presser, S ;
Singer, E .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2000, 64 (04) :413-428
[7]   Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century [J].
Curtin, R ;
Presser, S ;
Singer, E .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2005, 69 (01) :87-98
[8]  
De Heer W., 2002, Survey Nonresponse, P41
[9]  
DRAGO R, 1999, SOC LEISURE, V21, P555
[10]  
Fay RE., 1989, P SECT SURV RES METH, P212