Prognostic factors for hereditary cancer distress six months after BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing

被引:26
作者
van Oostrom, Iris
Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne
Duivenvoorden, Hugo J.
Brocker-Vriends, Annette H. J. T.
van Asperen, Christi J.
Sijmons, Rolf H.
Seynaeve, Caroline
Van Gool, Arthur R.
Klijn, Jan G. M.
Tibben, Aad
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Clin Genet, NL-3016 AH Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Med Psychol & Psychotherapy, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Human & Clin Genet, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Clin Genet, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Med Oncol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Psychiat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
genetic screening; psychological adjustment; BRCA1; BRCA2; hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal; cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study explored predictors for hereditary cancer distress six months after genetic susceptibility testing for a known familial BRCA1/2 or HNPCC related mutation, in order to gain insight into aspects relevant for the identification of individuals needing additional psychosocial support. Coping, illness representations, experiences with cancer in relatives and family system characteristics were assessed in 271 applicants for genetic testing before result disclosure. Hereditary cancer distress was assessed prospectively up to six months after disclosure. Regression analysis revealed that the pretest level of distress, complicated grief, the number of affected first-degree relatives and strong emotional illness representations were factors that best explained hereditary cancer distress. Other significant predictors were illness coherence, passive coping, distraction seeking, being aged < 13 years when a parent was affected by cancer and family communication. individuals who may benefit from additional support may be identified before result disclosure using a short instrument assessing the relevant aspects. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 77
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   THE DIFFERENTIATION IN THE FAMILY SYSTEM SCALE (DIFS) [J].
ANDERSON, SA ;
SABATELLI, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 1992, 20 (01) :77-89
[2]   Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review [J].
Broadstock, M ;
Michie, S ;
Marteau, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 8 (10) :731-738
[3]  
BUURMEIER FA, 1988, GEZINS DIMENSIE SCHA
[4]  
Chemtob CM, 1997, AM J PSYCHIAT, V154, P415
[5]   Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact [J].
Claes, E ;
Denayer, L ;
Evers-Kiebooms, G ;
Boogaerts, A ;
Legius, E .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 55 (02) :265-274
[6]   Distress and psychiatric morbidity among women from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families [J].
Coyne, JC ;
Benazon, NR ;
Gaba, CG ;
Calzone, K ;
Weber, BL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 68 (05) :864-874
[7]   What do ratings of cancer-specific distress mean among women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer? [J].
Coyne, JC ;
Kruus, L ;
Racioppo, M ;
Calzone, KA ;
Armstrong, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2003, 116A (03) :222-228
[8]  
Decruyenaere M, 2000, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V9, P528, DOI 10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<528::AID-PON486>3.3.CO
[9]  
2-R
[10]   Looking forward and back: Distress among women at familial risk for breast cancer [J].
Erblich, J ;
Bovbjerg, DH ;
Valdimarsdottir, HB .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2000, 22 (01) :53-59