Fatigue-life assessment and validation techniques for metallic vascular implants

被引:25
作者
James, Brad A. [1 ]
Sire, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Exponent Inc, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
Fatigue validation; Durability; Flaw-tolerant design; Small crack; OUTLET STRUT FRACTURE; VALVE; PROPAGATION; MECHANICS; GROWTH; STENTS; CRACKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.028
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学];
摘要
Vascular implants, such as cardiac valve prostheses. stents, and other devices are often subjected to complex loading conditions in vivo, which can include pulsatile pressure cycling, bending, torsion, tension, and compression, among others. At an average of 72 heartbeats per minute, pulsatile loading alone produces approximately 40-million cycles per year. With design lives of 10-15 years, fatigue performance assessment and validation of these devices are critical for the designer, as mechanical failure can have serious consequences. Historically, various fatigue life assessment approaches have been used to validate endovascular device fatigue performance, including durability testing, stress/strain-life analysis, and damage tolerance-based analysis. This paper explores the merits and shortcomings of each of these design approaches, and provides recommendations for fatigue-life validation of endovascular implants. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 186
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
[Anonymous], E73991 ASTM
[2]
Cao HC, 1996, J HEART VALVE DIS, V5, pS32
[3]
CHAN KS, 1986, T ASME, V1108, P206
[4]
CHWIRUT DJ, 1989, MED PROG TECHNOL, V14, P193
[5]
Collins JA., 1993, FAILURE MAT MECH DES
[6]
Dowling NE, 2013, Mechanical behavior of materials-engineering methods for deformation, fracture, and fatigue
[7]
ELHADDAD MH, 1979, ASTM STP, V677, P274
[8]
ELHADDAD MH, 1978, T ASME, P1
[9]
ELHADDAD MH, 1979, METHODS PREDICTING M, P41
[10]
Grunkemeier GL, 1995, J LONG-TERM EFF MED, V5, P155