Recent Advances in Cancer Therapy Targeting Proteins Involved in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

被引:152
作者
Bolderson, Emma [1 ]
Richard, Derek J. [1 ]
Zhou, Bin-Bing S. [2 ]
Khanna, Kum Kum [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Inst Med Res, Signal Transduct Lab, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
[2] Wyeth Ayerst Res, Oncol Discovery, Pearl River, NY USA
关键词
CELL-CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; IN-VIVO; P53; PATHWAY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; KINASE INHIBITOR; TUMOR-CELLS; RAD51; ATM; COMPLEX; GENE;
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0096
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Damage to genetic material represents a persistent and ubiquitous threat to genomic stability. Once DNA damage is detected, a multifaceted signaling network is activated that halts the cell cycle, initiates repair, and in some instances induces apoptotic cell death. In this article, we will review DNA damage surveillance networks, which maintain the stability of our genome, and discuss the efforts underway to identify chemotherapeutic compounds targeting the core components of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) response pathway. The majority of tumor cells have defects in maintaining genomic stability owing to the loss of an appropriate response to DNA damage. New anticancer agents are exploiting this vulnerability of cancer cells to enhance therapeutic indexes, with limited normal tissue toxicity. Recently inhibitors of the checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2 have been shown to sensitize tumor cells to DNA damaging agents. In addition, the treatment of BRCAl- or BRCA2-deficient tumor cells with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors also leads to specific tumor killing. Due to the numerous roles of p53 in genomic stability and its defects in many human cancers, therapeutic agents that restore p53 activity in tumors are the subject of multiple clinical trials. In this article we highlight the proteins mentioned above and catalog several additional players in the DNA damage response pathway, including ATM, DNA-PK, and the MRN complex, which might be amenable to pharmacological interventions and lead to new approaches to sensitize cancer cells to radio- and chemotherapy. The challenge is how to identify those patients most receptive to these treatments. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(20):6314-20)
引用
收藏
页码:6314 / 6320
页数:7
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases [J].
Abraham, RT .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 15 (17) :2177-2196
[2]   XLF interacts with the XRCC4-DNA ligase IV complex to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining [J].
Ahnesorg, P ;
Smith, P ;
Jackson, SP .
CELL, 2006, 124 (02) :301-313
[3]  
Andrews BJ, 2004, MOL CANCER THER, V3, P385
[4]   Keeping checkpoint kinases in line: new selective inhibitors in clinical trials [J].
Ashwell, Susan ;
Janetka, James W. ;
Zabludoff, Sonya .
EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS, 2008, 17 (09) :1331-1340
[5]   DNA damage detection and repair pathways - Recent advances with inhibitors of checkpoint kinases in cancer therapy [J].
Ashwell, Susan ;
Zabludoff, Sonya .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (13) :4032-4037
[6]  
Audeh MW, 2009, J CLIN ONCOL, V27
[7]   DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation [J].
Bakkenist, CJ ;
Kastan, MB .
NATURE, 2003, 421 (6922) :499-506
[8]   Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response [J].
Bao, Shideng ;
Wu, Qiulian ;
McLendon, Roger E. ;
Hao, Yueling ;
Shi, Qing ;
Hjelmeland, Anita B. ;
Dewhirst, Mark W. ;
Bigner, Darell D. ;
Rich, Jeremy N. .
NATURE, 2006, 444 (7120) :756-760
[9]   Breaching the DNA damage checkpoint via PF-00477736, a novel small-molecule inhibitor of checkpoint kinase 1 [J].
Blasina, Alessandra ;
Hallin, Jill ;
Chen, Enhong ;
Arango, Maria Elena ;
Kraynov, Eugenia ;
Register, James ;
Grant, Stephan ;
Ninkovic, Sacha ;
Chen, Ping ;
Nichols, Tim ;
O'Connor, Patrick ;
Anderes, Kenna .
MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 7 (08) :2394-2404
[10]   MDM2 is a central node in the p53 pathway: 12 years and counting [J].
Bond, GL ;
Hu, WW ;
Levine, AJ .
CURRENT CANCER DRUG TARGETS, 2005, 5 (01) :3-8