Responses of the rat olfactory epithelium to retronasal air flow

被引:33
作者
Scott, John W. [1 ]
Acevedo, Humberto P.
Sherrill, Lisa
Phan, Maggie
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Cell Biol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Nutr & Hlth Sci Program, Div Biol & Biomed Sci, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1152/jn.01305.2006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Responses of the rat olfactory epithelium were assessed with the electroolfactogram while odorants were presented to the external nares with an artificial sniff or to the internal nares by positive pressure. A series of seven odorants that varied from very polar, hydrophilic odorants to very nonpolar, hydrophobic odorants were used. Although the polar odorants activated the dorsal olfactory epithelium when presented by the external nares ( orthonasal presentation), they were not effective when forced through the nasal cavity from the internal nares ( retronasal presentation). However, the nonpolar odorants were effective in both stimulus modes. These results were independent of stimulus concentration or of humidity of the carrier air. Similar results were obtained with multiunit recordings from olfactory bulb. These results help to explain why human investigations often report differences in the sensation or ability to discriminate odorants presented orthonasally versus retronasally. The results also strongly support the importance of odorant sorption in normal olfactory processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1941 / 1950
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Centre-surround inhibition among olfactory bulb glomeruli [J].
Aungst, JL ;
Heyward, PM ;
Puche, AC ;
Karnup, SV ;
Hayar, A ;
Szabo, G ;
Shipley, MT .
NATURE, 2003, 426 (6967) :623-629
[2]   POTENTIATION AND OVERSHADOWING IN ODOR-AVERSION LEARNING - ROLE OF METHOD OF ODOR PRESENTATION, THE DISTAL-PROXIMAL CUE DISTINCTION, AND THE CONDITIONABILITY OF ODOR [J].
BOUTON, ME ;
JONES, DL ;
MCPHILLIPS, SA ;
SWARTZENTRUBER, D .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1986, 17 (02) :115-138
[3]  
BRUKE J, 1984, BOOK PAPER GROUP ANN, P13
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF MOUTH MOVEMENTS, SWALLOWING, AND SPITTING ON RETRONASAL ODOR PERCEPTION [J].
BURDACH, KJ ;
DOTY, RL .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1987, 41 (04) :353-356
[5]   Comparison between orthonasal and retronasal flavour perception at different concentrations [J].
Diaz, ME .
FLAVOUR AND FRAGRANCE JOURNAL, 2004, 19 (06) :499-504
[6]   Intranasal concentrations of orally administered flavors [J].
Frasnelli, J ;
van Ruth, S ;
Kriukova, I ;
Hummel, T .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 2005, 30 (07) :575-582
[7]   Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation [J].
Frasnelli, J ;
Heilmann, S ;
Hummel, T .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2004, 362 (01) :65-69
[8]   Odorant binding and conformational dynamics in the odorant-binding protein [J].
Hajjar, Eric ;
Perahia, David ;
Debat, Helene ;
Nespoulous, Claude ;
Robert, Charles H. .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 281 (40) :29929-29937
[9]  
Hansen C. M., 1999, HANSEN SOLUBILITY PA
[10]   A new method for comparing orthonasal and retronasal olfaction [J].
Heilmann, S ;
Hummel, T .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 118 (02) :412-419