Inhibition of optimal behavior by social transmission in the guppy depends on shoaling

被引:13
作者
Bates, L [1 ]
Chappell, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
关键词
allelomimesis; guppies; local enhancement; maladaption; Poecilia reticulata; social transmission; trade-offs;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/13.6.827
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research has suggested social learning of foraging behavior can inhibit learning of the optimal behavior pattern. Based on their transmission chain design, we used small groups of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) to determine the degree to which the optimal behavior pattern was inhibited by socially learned information. A founder group was trained to take a long, energetically costly route to a food source. The members of this group were gradually replaced with naive conspecifics, Replicating the findings of the earlier researchers, it was clear that the behavior of the founders strongly influenced the behavior of the naive fish, probably through a process of local enhancement. When tested as a group, the naive fish chose the long route to the food source significantly more often than chance. Each naive fish was also tested in isolation. When tested alone, there was a significant tendency to choose the short route despite following the long route when tested as a group. These results suggest social learning does not inhibit learning of optimal behavior patterns but that a trade-off occurs when tested in the group condition. It is possible that the advantages for an individual fish of swimming with the shoal, and thus following the socially learned route, may have outweighed the potential energetic costs of taking this longer route.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 831
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Bateson P., 1988, P191
[2]   OPTIMAL FORAGING, MARGINAL VALUE THEOREM [J].
CHARNOV, EL .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1976, 9 (02) :129-136
[3]  
CURIO E, 1978, Z TIERPSYCHOL, V48, P184
[4]   COLLECTIVE PATTERNS AND DECISION-MAKING [J].
DENEUBOURG, JL ;
GOSS, S .
ETHOLOGY ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1989, 1 (04) :295-311
[5]   Individual versus social learning: Evolutionary analysis in a fluctuating environment [J].
Feldman, MW ;
Aoki, K ;
Kumm, J .
ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1996, 104 (03) :209-231
[6]  
Galef Bennett G. Jr., 1996, P3, DOI 10.1016/B978-012273965-1/50002-9
[7]   WHY BEHAVIOR PATTERNS THAT ANIMALS LEARN SOCIALLY ARE LOCALLY ADAPTIVE [J].
GALEF, BG .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1995, 49 (05) :1325-1334
[8]   Who follows whom? Shoaling preferences and social learning of foraging information in guppies [J].
Lachlan, RF ;
Crooks, L ;
Laland, KN .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1998, 56 :181-190
[9]  
Laland Kevin N., 1996, P129, DOI 10.1016/B978-012273965-1/50008-X
[10]   Is social learning always locally adaptive? [J].
Laland, KN .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1996, 52 :637-640