Mutation at p53 serine 389 does not rescue the embryonic lethality in mdm2 or mdm4 null mice

被引:16
作者
Iwakuma, T
Parant, JM
Fasulo, M
Zwart, E
Jacks, T
de Vries, A
Lozano, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Mol Genet, Sect Canc Genet, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Lab Toxicol Pathol & Genet, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] MIT, Ctr Canc Res, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
p53; phosphorylation; mdm2; mdm4; embryogenesis;
D O I
10.1038/sj.onc.1207793
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mdm2 and its homolog Mdm4 inhibit the function of the tumor suppressor p53. Targeted disruption of either mdm2 or mdm4 genes in mice results in embryonic lethality that is completely rescued by concomitant deletion of p53, suggesting that deletion of negative regulators of p53 results in a constitutively active p53. Thus, these mouse models offer a unique in vivo system to assay the functional significance of different p53 modi. cations. Phosphorylation of serine 389 in murine p53 occurs specifically after ultraviolet-light-induced DNA damage, and phosphorylation of this site enhances p53 activity both in vitro and in vivo. Recently, mice with a serine to alanine substitution at serine 389 (p53(S389A)) in the endogenous p53 locus were generated. To examine the in vivo significance of serine 389 phosphorylation during embryogenesis, we crossed these mutant mice to mice lacking mdm2 or mdm4. The p53S389A allele did not alter the embryonic lethality of mdm2 or mdm4. Additional crosses to assay the effect of one p53S389A allele with a p53 null allele also did not rescue the lethal phenotypes. In conclusion, the phenotypes due to loss of mdm2 or mdm4 were not even partially rescued by p53S389A, suggesting that p53S389A is functionally wild type during embryogenesis.
引用
收藏
页码:7644 / 7650
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Hypoxia attenuates the p53 response to cellular damage [J].
Achison, M ;
Hupp, TR .
ONCOGENE, 2003, 22 (22) :3431-3440
[2]   Post-translational modifications and activation of p53 by genotoxic stresses [J].
Appella, E ;
Anderson, CW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 268 (10) :2764-2772
[3]  
Ashcroft M, 1999, MOL CELL BIOL, V19, P1751
[4]   Recruitment of p300/CBP in p53-dependent signal pathways [J].
Avantaggiati, ML ;
Ogryzko, V ;
Gardner, K ;
Giordano, A ;
Levine, AS ;
Kelly, K .
CELL, 1997, 89 (07) :1175-1184
[5]   DNA damage induced p53 stabilization: no indication for an involvement of p53 phosphorylation [J].
Blattner, C ;
Tobiasch, E ;
Litfen, M ;
Rahmsdorf, HJ ;
Herrlich, P .
ONCOGENE, 1999, 18 (09) :1723-1732
[6]   Comparative study of the p53-mdm2 and p53-MDMX interfaces [J].
Böttger, V ;
Böttger, A ;
Garcia-Echeverria, C ;
Ramos, YFM ;
van der Eb, AJ ;
Jochemsen, AG ;
Lane, DP .
ONCOGENE, 1999, 18 (01) :189-199
[7]  
BRUINS W, 2004, IN PRESS MOL CELL BI
[8]   Phosphorylation of murine p53 at Ser-18 regulates the p53 responses to DNA damage [J].
Chao, C ;
Saito, S ;
Anderson, CW ;
Appella, E ;
Xu, Y .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (22) :11936-11941
[9]  
Chavez-Reyes A, 2003, CANCER RES, V63, P8664
[10]  
Chen JD, 1996, MOL CELL BIOL, V16, P2445