Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework

被引:134
作者
Choi, Hyung Tae
Beven, Keith
机构
[1] Korea Forest Res Inst, Dept Forest Environm, Seoul 130712, South Korea
[2] Univ Lancaster, Inst Environm & Nat Sci, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
TOPMODEL; GLUE; seasonality; multi-criteria evaluation; fuzzy classification;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.07.012
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A new approach to multi-criteria model evaluation is presented. The approach is consistent with the equifinality thesis and is developed within the Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) framework. The predictions of Monte Carlo realisations of TOP-MODEL parameter sets are evaluated using a number of performance measures calibrated for both global (annual) and seasonal (30 day) periods. The seasonal periods were clustered using a Fuzzy C-means algorithm, into 15 types representing different hydrological conditions. The model shows good performance on a classical efficiency measure at the global level, but no model realizations were found that were behavioural over all multi-period clusters and all performance measures, raising questions about what should be considered as an acceptable model performance. Prediction uncertainties can still be calculated by allowing that different clusters require different parameter sets. Variations in parameter distributions between clusters, as well as examination of where observed discharges depart from model prediction bounds, give some indication of model structure deficiencies. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 336
页数:21
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Rainfall-runoff Modelling, The Primer
[2]   Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data [J].
Aronica, G ;
Hankin, B ;
Beven, K .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1998, 22 (04) :349-365
[3]  
Beven K, 1997, HYDROL PROCESS, V11, P1069
[4]   Comment on "Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models" by M. Thiemann, M. Trosset, H. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian [J].
Beven, K ;
Young, P .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2003, 39 (05)
[5]   A manifesto for the equifinality thesis [J].
Beven, K .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 320 (1-2) :18-36
[6]   PROPHECY, REALITY AND UNCERTAINTY IN DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELING [J].
BEVEN, K .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1993, 16 (01) :41-51
[7]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[8]   Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment [J].
Beven, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2002, 458 (2026) :2465-2484
[9]   Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology [J].
Beven, K ;
Freer, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 249 (1-4) :11-29
[10]   A dynamic TOPMODEL [J].
Beven, K ;
Freer, J .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2001, 15 (10) :1993-2011