The evolution of altruism: Game theory in multilevel selection and inclusive fitness

被引:48
作者
Fletcher, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Zwick, Martin
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Syst Sci PhD Program, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Zool, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Hamilton's rule; n-player prisoner's dilemma; price covariance equation; Simpson's paradox; strong versus weak altruism; STRUCTURED DEMES; KIN SELECTION; COOPERATION; ASSORTMENT; MECHANISM; BEHAVIOR; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.030
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Although the prisoner's dilemma (PD) has been used extensively to study reciprocal altruism, here we show that the n-player prisoner's dilemma (NPD) is also central to two other prominent theories of the evolution of altruism: inclusive fitness and multilevel selection. An NPD model captures the essential factors for the evolution of altruism directly in its parameters and integrates important aspects of these two theories such as Hamilton's rule, Simpson's paradox, and the Price covariance equation. The model also suggests a simple interpretation of the Price selection decomposition and an alternative decomposition that is symmetrical and complementary to it. In some situations this alternative shows the temporal changes in within- and between-group selection more clearly than the Price equation. In addition, we provide a new perspective on strong vs. weak altruism by identifying their different underlying game structures (based on absolute fitness) and showing how their evolutionary dynamics are nevertheless similar under selection (based on relative fitness). In contrast to conventional wisdom, the model shows that both strong and weak altruism can evolve in periodically formed random groups of non-conditional strategies if groups are multigenerational. An integrative approach based on the NPD helps unify different perspectives on the evolution of altruism. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 36
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation [J].
Aktipis, CA .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :249-260
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SYMBIOSIS CELL EVOLU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Cooperation among Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective
[4]   The kin composition of social groups:: Trading group size for degree of altruism [J].
Avilés, L ;
Fletcher, JA ;
Cutter, AD .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2004, 164 (02) :132-144
[5]   Solving the freeloaders paradox:: Genetic associations and frequency-dependent selection in the evolution of cooperation among nonrelatives [J].
Avilés, L .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (22) :14268-14273
[6]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
AXELROD, R ;
HAMILTON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4489) :1390-1396
[7]  
Axelrod Robert, 1984, THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION
[8]   The co-evolution of individual behaviors and social institutions [J].
Bowles, S ;
Choi, JK ;
Hopfensitz, A .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 223 (02) :135-147
[9]   IS THE REPEATED PRISONERS-DILEMMA A GOOD MODEL OF RECIPROCAL ALTRUISM [J].
BOYD, R .
ETHOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1988, 9 (2-4) :211-222
[10]   The evolution of altruistic punishment [J].
Boyd, R ;
Gintis, H ;
Bowles, S ;
Richerson, PJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (06) :3531-3535