Individualizing chemotherapy for solid tumors - Is there any alternative?

被引:54
作者
Cree, IA [1 ]
Kurbacher, CM [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV COLOGNE, MED CTR, FRAUENKLIN, LAB CHEMOSENSITIVITATESTUNGEN, D-50931 COLOGNE, GERMANY
关键词
ATP; chemosensitivity; chemotherapy; luminescence; in vitro; prediction;
D O I
10.1097/00001813-199707000-00001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The burgeoning understanding of the molecular basis of carcinogenesis and tumor drug resistance is matched by an appreciation of the complexity of individual tumors. This complexity underlies the heterogeneity of response to treatment and is a major barrier to improving the outcome of solid tumor chemotherapy. While individualization of chemotherapy is theoretically attractive, past attempts to provide such information have produced many papers and little progress. However, the disparate molecular make-up of tumors of the same clinicopathologic type suggests that there may be no alternative and recent progress suggests that individualization of cancer therapy could have considerable benefits. In this review, we consider the alternative methods which might be employed and the requirements which need to be met before they are introduced. It will be some time before molecular analysis can predict chemosensitivity, although this may prove feasible for more specific agents than those currently in use. However, newly developed cellular chemosensitivity assays such as the ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay allied to selected molecular measurement may already have the potential to select optimal therapy for patients. We need to develop a diverse series of acceptable and biologically logical regimens for each of the common tumor types, all of which can be tested in vitro.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 548
页数:8
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Specific P53 mutations are associated with de novo resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer patients [J].
Aas, T ;
Borresen, AL ;
Geisler, S ;
SmithSorensen, B ;
Johnsen, H ;
Varhaug, JE ;
Akslen, LA ;
Lonning, PE .
NATURE MEDICINE, 1996, 2 (07) :811-814
[2]  
Alberts D S, 1982, Prog Clin Cancer, V8, P147
[3]   TCA-100 TUMOR CHEMOSENSITIVITY ASSAY - DIFFERENCES IN SENSITIVITY BETWEEN CULTURED TUMOR-CELL LINES AND CLINICAL-STUDIES [J].
ANDREOTTI, PE ;
LINDER, D ;
HARTMANN, DM ;
CREE, IA ;
PAZZAGLI, M ;
BRUCKNER, HW .
JOURNAL OF BIOLUMINESCENCE AND CHEMILUMINESCENCE, 1994, 9 (06) :373-378
[4]  
ANDREOTTI PE, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, P5276
[5]  
ANDREOTTI PE, 1991, BIOLUMINESCENCE AND CHEMILUMINESCENCE, P417
[6]  
ANDREOTTI PE, 1993, BIOLUMINESCENCE CHEM, P271
[7]  
ANTMAN K, 1994, MONOGR NATL CANCER I, V16, P91
[8]   PREDICTION OF RESPONSE TO DRUG-THERAPY OF CANCER - A REVIEW OF INVITRO ASSAYS [J].
BELLAMY, WT .
DRUGS, 1992, 44 (05) :690-708
[9]  
Bonadonna G, 1995, Surg Oncol Clin N Am, V4, P701
[10]  
Bosanquet A G, 1993, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V5, P195, DOI 10.1016/S0936-6555(05)80226-2