Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience

被引:115
作者
Ham, C
机构
[1] Health Services Management Centre, Univ. Birmingham, Pk. Hse., 40 E.
关键词
priority setting; rationing; guidelines; public involvement;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-8510(97)00054-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Priority setting in health care is not new but it is an issue of growing importance. In publicly financed health care systems, the combination of constrained resources and increasing demands has led policy makers to address this issue more directly than in the past. This is exemplified by experience in Oregon, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden and the UK. In each of these systems, policy makers have taken the initiative to set priorities on a more explicit basis. This paper compares and contrasts experience in these systems and identifies a number of emerging themes. The work done so far can be likened to an exercise in policy learning in which policy makers have tried out a range of approaches and have adjusted course several times in the process. Priority setting is not amenable to once and for all solutions and the issues involved must be kept under continuous review. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 66
页数:18
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, MANAGING SCARCITY
[2]  
BORSTEILERS E, 1996, MED TECHNOLOGY ASSES
[3]  
*DEP HLTH, 1994, REG COST EFF STUD LO
[4]  
*DEPT HTLH, 1995, CM2826
[5]   PRIORITY SETTING - LESSONS FROM OREGON [J].
DIXON, J ;
WELCH, HG .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8746) :891-894
[6]  
DONES GD, 1996, DAILY TELEGRAPH 0109, P4
[7]  
DUNNING A, 1996, OECD HLTH CARE REFOR
[8]   RATIONING CARE IN OREGON - THE NEW ACCOUNTABILITY [J].
FOX, DM ;
LEICHTER, HM .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1991, 10 (02) :7-27
[9]  
*GOV COMM CHOIC HL, 1992, REP RIJSW MIN WELF H
[10]   RATIONING IN ACTION - PRIORITY SETTING IN THE NHS - REPORTS FROM 6 DISTRICTS [J].
HAM, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6901) :435-438