Opinions of physical therapy education program directors on essential functions

被引:6
作者
Ingram, D [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TENNESSEE,KNOXVILLE,TN
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 1997年 / 77卷 / 01期
关键词
Americans with Disabilities Act; educational programs; essential functions; physical therapist students;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/77.1.37
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of directors of physical therapy education programs concerning the essential functions physical therapist students must be able to complete, with or without reasonable accommodation. Subjects. Fifty-eight physical therapy education program directors participated. Methods. Participants completed surveys as part of a three-round Delphi technique. They had the opportunity to modify or make additions to the initial list in the first round and rate the items in the last two rounds using an ordinal scale. Results. All participants rated communication skills and practicing in a safe, ethical, and legal manner as definitely essential functions. Nearly universal agreement (95%-99%) was present for determining physical therapy needs of patients with movement dysfunction and demonstrating the ability to apply universal precautions. Performance of treatment procedures and performance of assessment procedures were rated essential by 90% to 95% of the participants. The least agreement was found for participation in the process of scientific inquiry. Conclusion and Discussion. There is agreement among the physical therapy education program directors concerning the essential functions that should be required of students. The results of this study should serve as a reference for physical therapy education programs for developing the essential functions required of students.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 45
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Anderson A, 1981, J Nurs Educ, V20, P22
[2]
IMPLEMENTING THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 IN HIGHER-EDUCATION [J].
BOWMAN, OJ ;
MARZOUK, DK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1992, 46 (06) :521-533
[3]
CHICKADONZ G, 1983, NURSING HLTH CAR JUN, P327
[4]
*COMM ACCR PHYS TH, 1991, ACCR HDB
[5]
CUNNINGHAM WG, 1982, SYSTEMATIC PLANNING
[6]
Davidson S, 1994, Nurse Educ, V19, P31, DOI 10.1097/00006223-199403000-00010
[7]
Delbecq A.L., 1986, Group techniques for program planning, V2nd
[8]
THE AMERICANS AND DISABILITIES ACT .2. IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE FOR MEDICAL-SCHOOLS [J].
ESSEXSORLIE, D .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1994, 69 (07) :525-535
[9]
FRENCH S, 1988, SOCIOLOGY HLTH ILLNE, V10, P576
[10]
HARTMAN DW, 1981, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V62, P90