Injury rates, hooking efficiency and mortality potential of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) captured on circle hooks and octopus hooks

被引:50
作者
Cooke, SJ
Suski, CD
Siepker, MJ
Ostrand, KG
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Program Ecol Evolut & Conservat Biol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Ctr Aquat Ecol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Biol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[4] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Sam Parr Biol Stn, Ctr Aquat Ecol, Kinmundy, IL 62854 USA
关键词
hook type; catch-and-release; injury rates; capture efficiency; recreational angling; largemouth bass;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-7836(02)00244-8
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
We compared the injury rates, hooking efficiency, and mortality potential of circle hooks and the more conventional octopus hooks for largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) captured on minnows in central Illinois. Fish captured on circle hooks (N = 125) were hooked less deeply, exhibited less bleeding, and were more easily removed from the hook than were those captured on octopus hooks (N = 134). The majority of fish captured using both hook types were hooked in the upper lip. Mortality rates were uniformly low for both hook types (circle, 5.1%; octopus, 6.6%). Fish that were identified as potential mortalities were typically hooked deeply in a vital organ or tissue (i.e., heart, gullet, gill arch), exhibited substantial bleeding, and were difficult to remove from the hook. No size-selective trends were noted among hook types, nor were there any differences in total length among mortalities and survivors. Capture efficiency for circle hooks was half that of octopus hooks. Our results suggest that circle hooks do provide some minimal conservation benefits relative to conventional octopus hooks despite having similar mortality rates. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 144
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] CARUSO PG, 2000, F57R MASS DIV MAR FI
  • [2] Cooke SJ, 2001, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V21, P333, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020&lt
  • [3] 1033:EORGOT&gt
  • [4] 2.0.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] COOKE SJ, 2003, IN PRESS FISH MANAGE
  • [7] Dunmall KM, 2001, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V21, P242, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(2001)021<0242:TEOSLO>2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] Grover AM, 2002, AM FISH S S, V30, P39
  • [10] LUKACOVIC R, 2000, STOCK ASSESSMENT SEL