The provision of public-sector services by family planning agencies in 1995

被引:34
作者
Frost, JJ
Bolzan, M
机构
[1] Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York
来源
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES | 1997年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2953347
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Results from a 1995 survey of a nationally representative sample of 603 publicly funded family planning agencies reveal that 96% rely on federal funding, 60% on state funding and 40% on local funding to provide family planning and other services. Although only 25% of the contraceptive clients served by these publicly funded agencies-including health departments hospitals, Planned Parenthood affiliates, independent agencies and community and migrant health centers-are Medicaid recipients, 57% have incomes below the federal poverty level and an additional 33% have incomes of 100-250% of the poverty level. Some 40% of the recipients of family planning services are black, Hispanic or from other minority groups, and 30% are younger than 20. Each agency employs an average of three physicians who together provide approximately seven hours of care per week and seven midlevel clinicians who provide 71 hours of care per week. The pill is the only contraceptive method provided by all agencies, but 96% provide the injectable; at least 90% spermicide, the condom and the diaphragm; 78% periodic abstinence; and 59% the implant. The remaining methods are provided by fewer than 50% of agencies. Almost 70% of agencies have at least one special program of outreach, education or services to meet the needs of teenagers, but far fewer have special programs for such hard-to-reach groups as the homeless, the disabled or substance users.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 14
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
*A GUTTM I, 1995, UN UN REPR CAR MAN C
[2]   Taking family planning services to hard-to-reach populations [J].
Donovan, P .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1996, 28 (03) :120-126
[3]   Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures [J].
Forrest, JD ;
Samara, R .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1996, 28 (05) :188-195
[4]   The family planning attitudes and experiences of low-income women [J].
Forrest, JD ;
Frost, JJ .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1996, 28 (06) :246-&
[5]  
FORREST JD, 1996, FAMILY PLANNING PERS, V28, P277
[6]  
FROST JJ, 1996, FAMILY PLANNING PERS, V29, P92
[7]   FAMILY-PLANNING AGENCIES - SERVICES, POLICIES AND FUNDING [J].
HENSHAW, SK .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 26 (02) :52-&
[8]  
HENSHAW SK, 1994, FAMILY PLANNING PERS, V26, P82
[9]   Private physicians' provision of contraceptive services [J].
Landry, DJ ;
Forrest, JD .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1996, 28 (05) :203-209
[10]   DOES CHOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE TO CONTRACEPTIVE USE - EVIDENCE FROM EAST JAVA']JAVA [J].
PARIANI, S ;
HEER, DM ;
VANARSDOL, MD .
STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 1991, 22 (06) :384-390