Adaptive single-shot phase measurements: A semiclassical approach

被引:64
作者
Wiseman, HM
Killip, RB
机构
[1] UNIV AUCKLAND, DEPT PHYS, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
[2] UNIV AUCKLAND, DEPT MATH, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 1997年 / 56卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.56.944
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The standard single-shot estimate for the phase of a single-mode pulse of light is the argument of the complex amplitude of the field. This complex amplitude can be measured by heterodyne detection, in which the local oscillator is detuned from the system so that all quadratures are sampled equally. Because different quadratures do not commute, such a measurement introduces noise into the phase estimate, with a variance scaling as N-1, where N is the maximum photon number. This represents the shot-noise limit or standard quantum limit (SQL). Recently, one of us [H.M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4587 (1995)] proposed a way to improve upon this: a real-time feedback loop can control the local oscillator phase to be equal to the estimated system phase plus pi/2, so that the phase quadrature of the system is measured preferentially. The phase estimate used in the feedback loop at time t is a functional of the photocurrent from time 0 up to time t in the single-shot measurement. In this paper we consider a very simple feedback scheme involving only linear electronic elements. Approaching the problem from semiclassical detection theory, we obtain analytical results for asymptotically large photon numbers. Specifically, we are able to show that the noise introduced by the measurement has a variance scaling as N-3/2. This is much less than the SQL variance, but still much greater than the minimum intrinsic phase variance which scales as N-2. We briefly discuss the effect of detector inefficiencies and delays in the feedback loop.
引用
收藏
页码:944 / 957
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BANDILLA A, 1969, ANN PHYS-BERLIN, V23, P323, DOI 10.1002/andp.19694780704
[2]   Phase measurement by projection synthesis [J].
Barnett, SM ;
Pegg, DT .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1996, 76 (22) :4148-4150
[3]   LOWER BOUNDS ON PHASE SENSITIVITY IN IDEAL AND FEASIBLE MEASUREMENTS [J].
DARIANO, GM ;
PARIS, MGA .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1994, 49 (04) :3022-3036
[4]  
Davies E. B., 1976, Quantum theory of open systems
[5]  
DOLINAR SJ, UNPUB
[6]  
Gardiner C.W., 1985, Handbook of stochastic methods, V3
[7]  
Helstrom C. W., 1976, QUANTUM DETECTION ES, P163
[8]  
Helstrom C. W., 1976, QUANTUM DETECTION ES
[9]  
Holevo A. S., 1982, SOV MATH, V26, P3
[10]  
HOLEVO AS, 1984, LECT NOTES MATH, V1055, P153