Integrating freshwater and terrestrial priorities in conservation planning

被引:36
作者
Amis, Mao A. [1 ,2 ]
Rouget, Mathieu [3 ]
Lotter, Mervyn [4 ]
Day, Jenny [2 ]
机构
[1] WWF South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Freshwater Res Unit, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
[3] S African Natl Biodivers Inst, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
[4] Mpumalanga Pk Board, ZA-1120 Lydenburg, South Africa
关键词
Freshwater and terrestrial biodiversity; Conservation assessment; Integration; Overlap; PROTECTED AREAS; BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT; RESERVE SELECTION; RIVER-BASIN; IRREPLACEABILITY; NETWORKS; REPRESENTATION; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.021
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The integration of freshwater and terrestrial biodiversity priorities in systematic conservation planning is a major challenge to conservation planners. Maintaining upstream-downstream connectivity and the influence of catchments on freshwater ecological integrity are some of the issues that make it difficult to reconcile terrestrial and freshwater conservation planning. As a result most conservation assessments are often biased towards terrestrial systems without adequate incorporation of freshwater biodiversity in determining priority areas for conservation. In this paper, we propose a protocol for integrating the assessment of freshwater and terrestrial priorities in conservation planning, based on a case study from Mpumalanga Province in South Africa. The approach involves the separate assessment of freshwater priority areas, and using the outcome to influence the selection of terrestrial priority areas. This allowed both freshwater and terrestrial biodiversity to be incorporated in conservation planning without compromising their unique requirements. To test the effectiveness of this approach, we assessed percentage overlap between freshwater and terrestrial priority areas, target achievement, and the area required to achieve targets. We then compared the outcome from the proposed approach with the separate assessments of freshwater and terrestrial biodiversity priorities, and when both systems are given an equal weighting in a single assessment. The results showed that there was a noticeable improvement in the overlap of priority areas for freshwater and terrestrial biodiversity from 23% to 47%. Target achievement for freshwater biodiversity improved by 10% when terrestrial assessment was based on freshwater priority areas as opposed to terrestrial systems being assessed alone. There was negligible increase in area required, whether there was integration of freshwater and terrestrial biodiversity or no integration. We conclude that the most efficient way to achieve integration in conservation planning is to preferentially select areas where freshwater and terrestrial biodiversity priorities overlap. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2217 / 2226
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Conservation biology for the biodiversity crisis: A freshwater follow-up
    Abell, R
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (05) : 1435 - 1437
  • [2] Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters
    Abell, Robin
    Allan, J. David
    Lehner, Bernhard
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 134 (01) : 48 - 63
  • [3] Effectiveness of protected area networks in representing freshwater biodiversity:: the case of a Mediterranean river basin (south-eastern Spain)
    Abellan, Pedro
    Sanchez-Fernandez, David
    Velasco, Josefa
    Millan, Andres
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2007, 17 (04) : 361 - 374
  • [4] Amis MA, 2007, WATER SA, V33, P215
  • [5] Ball IR, 2000, MARXAN V 1 8 6 MARIN
  • [6] Conservation planning with irreplaceability: does the method matter?
    Carwardine, J.
    Rochester, W. A.
    Richardson, K. S.
    Williams, K. J.
    Pressey, R. L.
    Possingham, H. P.
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2007, 16 (01) : 245 - 258
  • [7] A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot - the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa
    Cowling, RM
    Pressey, RL
    Rouget, M
    Lombard, AT
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 112 (1-2) : 191 - 216
  • [8] *DACE, 1999, MPUM STAT ENV REP
  • [9] *DEP WAT FOR, 1995, CROC RIV CATCHM E TR, V1
  • [10] Freshwater biodiversity:: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges
    Dudgeon, David
    Arthington, Angela H.
    Gessner, Mark O.
    Kawabata, Zen-Ichiro
    Knowler, Duncan J.
    Leveque, Christian
    Naiman, Robert J.
    Prieur-Richard, Anne-Helene
    Soto, Doris
    Stiassny, Melanie L. J.
    Sullivan, Caroline A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2006, 81 (02) : 163 - 182