Individual differences in stress and fatigue in two field studies of driving

被引:57
作者
Desmond, Paula A. [1 ]
Matthews, Gerald [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ, Dept Psychol, Georgetown, TX 78627 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Psychol, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
Stress; Fatigue; Individual differences; Coping; TASK-INDUCED FATIGUE; PERSONALITY; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; DIMENSIONS; SLEEPINESS; BEHAVIOR; STATES; MOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2008.12.006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This paper reports the findings of two field studies of Australian drivers in which individual differences in stress and fatigue were investigated. In the first study, 58 professional drivers completed measures of mood, fatigue and other subjective stress state measures, before and after performing a prolonged driving trip. The results indicated that the scales were sensitive to increased fatigue following the driving trip, and correlated appropriately with Fatigue Proneness, a driver stress trait. In the second study, 104 non-professional drivers completed identical subjective stress state measures as the professional drivers, before and after performing a driving trip. Drivers completed a measure of driving-related stress traits, the Driver Stress Inventory (DSI), and a measure of coping, the Driving Coping Questionnaire (DCQ). Both measures were predictive of state response to driving, and the association between Fatigue Proneness and post-drive fatigue found in the first study was replicated. Findings from these studies suggest that fatigue and stress reactions to driving are psychometrically distinct, but may have some common antecedents, such as use of emotion-focused coping. The studies confirm the importance of fatigue and stress as potential safety problems, but also highlight the role of individual differences in response to the demands of driving. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 276
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   DRIVER FATIGUE [J].
BROWN, ID .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1994, 36 (02) :298-314
[2]  
Craig A., 1992, HDB HUMAN PERFORMANC, V3, P289, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-650353-1.50017-4
[3]   Implications of task-induced fatigue effects for in-vehicle countermeasures to driver fatigue [J].
Desmond, PA ;
Matthews, G .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1997, 29 (04) :515-523
[4]  
Desmond PA, 2001, HUM FAC TRANSP, P455
[5]   Fatigue and automation-induced impairments in simulated driving performance [J].
Desmond, PA ;
Hancock, PA ;
Monette, JL .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, USER INFORMATION, AND HIGHWAY DESIGN, 1998, (1628) :8-14
[6]  
DESMOND PA, 1997, P 14 INT C ALC DRUGS
[7]  
Desmond PA., 2001, P HUM FACT ERG SOC 4, P1571, DOI 10.1177/154193120104502302
[8]  
DESMOND PA, 1997, THESIS U DUNDEE SCOT
[9]   PREDICTION OF MOOD AND RISK APPRAISALS FROM TRAIT MEASURES - 2 STUDIES OF SIMULATED DRIVING [J].
DORN, L ;
MATTHEWS, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1995, 9 (01) :25-42
[10]  
EMO AK, 2004, P HUM FACT ERG SOC 4, P1228