Power in Transition An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change

被引:332
作者
Avelino, Flor [1 ]
Rotmans, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Fac Social Sci, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
innovative power; interdisciplinarity; power; structural change; transformative power; transitions; FOUCAULT; HABERMAS; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1177/1368431009349830
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This article conceptualizes power in the context of long-term process of structural change. First, it discusses the field of transition studies, which deals with processes of structural change in societal systems on the basis of certain presumptions about power relations, but still lacks an explicit conceptualization of power. Then the article discusses some prevailing points of contestation in debates on power. It is argued that for the context of transition studies, it is necessary to develop an interdisciplinary framework in which power is explicitly conceptualized in relation to change. Subsequently, such a framework is presented, with reference to existing literature on power. Starting with a philosophical and operational definition of power, a typology is developed of the different ways in which power can be exercised, explicitly including innovative power and transformative power. Finally, the presented power framework is applied to transition studies, redefining pivotal transition concepts in terms of power and formulating hypotheses on the role of power in transitions. By doing so, the article not only offers an interdisciplinary framework to study power in the context of transition studies, but also contributes to power debates more generally by including innovation and transformation as acts of power, and thereby proposes a re-conceptualization of the relation between power and structural change.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 569
页数:27
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   OF TRUTH AND DISAGREEMENT - HABERMAS, FOUCAULT AND DEMOCRATIC DISCOURSE [J].
ALADJEM, TK .
HISTORY OF EUROPEAN IDEAS, 1995, 20 (4-6) :909-914
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, M FOUCAULT STRUCTURA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TRANSITION MANAGEMEN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, POWER READER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DRIFT Research Working Paper
[6]  
Arendt H., 2002, POWER READER, P137
[7]   2 FACES OF POWER [J].
BACHRACH, P ;
BARATZ, MS .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1962, 56 (04) :947-952
[8]  
Barnes Barry., 2002, Power: A Reader, P116
[9]   Systemic power [J].
Borch, C .
ACTA SOCIOLOGICA, 2005, 48 (02) :155-167
[10]  
Bourdieu Pierre., 2002, Power, P229