Global mass flux solutions from GRACE: A comparison of parameter estimation strategies-Mass concentrations versus Stokes coefficients

被引:104
作者
Rowlands, D. D. [1 ]
Luthcke, S. B. [1 ]
McCarthy, J. J. [2 ]
Klosko, S. M. [2 ]
Chinn, D. S. [2 ]
Lemoine, F. G. [1 ]
Boy, J. -P. [1 ,3 ]
Sabaka, T. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Planetary Geodynam Lab, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] SGT Inc, Greenbelt, MD 20770 USA
[3] Univ Strasbourg, CNRS, EOST IPGS, UMR 7516, F-67084 Strasbourg, France
关键词
GRAVITATIONAL-FIELD; GRAVITY-FIELD; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1029/2009JB006546
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The differences between mass concentration (mascon) parameters and standard Stokes coefficient parameters in the recovery of gravity information from gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) intersatellite K-band range rate data are investigated. First, mascons are decomposed into their Stokes coefficient representations to gauge the range of solutions available using each of the two types of parameters. Next, a direct comparison is made between two time series of unconstrained gravity solutions, one based on a set of global equal area mascon parameters (equivalent to 4 degrees X 4 degrees at the equator), and the other based on standard Stokes coefficients with each time series using the same fundamental processing of the GRACE tracking data. It is shown that in unconstrained solutions, the type of gravity parameter being estimated does not qualitatively affect the estimated gravity field. It is also shown that many of the differences in mass flux derivations from GRACE gravity solutions arise from the type of smoothing being used and that the type of smoothing that can be embedded in mascon solutions has distinct advantages over postsolution smoothing. Finally, a 1 year time series based on global 2 degrees equal area mascons estimated every 10 days is presented.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Modeling the barotropic response of the global ocean to atmospheric wind and pressure forcing -: comparisons with observations -: art. no. 1275 [J].
Carrère, L ;
Lyard, F .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (06) :8-1
[2]   SNOW LOAD EFFECT ON THE EARTHS ROTATION AND GRAVITATIONAL-FIELD, 1979-1985 [J].
CHAO, BF ;
OCONNOR, WP ;
CHANG, ATC ;
HALL, DK ;
FOSTER, JL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1987, 92 (B9) :9415-9422
[3]   Low degree spherical harmonic influences on Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) water storage estimates [J].
Chen, JL ;
Rodell, M ;
Wilson, CR ;
Famiglietti, JS .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2005, 32 (14) :1-4
[4]   Recent Greenland ice mass loss by drainage system from satellite gravity observations [J].
Luthcke, S. B. ;
Zwally, H. J. ;
Abdalati, W. ;
Rowlands, D. D. ;
Ray, R. D. ;
Nerem, R. S. ;
Lemoine, F. G. ;
McCarthy, J. J. ;
Chinn, D. S. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 314 (5803) :1286-1289
[5]   Monthly spherical harmonic gravity field solutions determined from GRACE inter-satellite range-rate data alone [J].
Luthcke, SB ;
Rowlands, DD ;
Lemoine, FG ;
Klosko, SM ;
Chinn, D ;
McCarthy, JJ .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (02)
[6]   Recent glacier mass changes in the Gulf of Alaska region from GRACE mascon solutions [J].
Luthcke, Scott B. ;
Arendt, Anthony A. ;
Rowlands, David D. ;
McCarthy, John J. ;
Larsen, Christopher F. .
JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 2008, 54 (188) :767-777
[7]   MASCONS - LUNAR MASS CONCENTRATIONS [J].
MULLER, PM ;
SJOGREN, WL .
SCIENCE, 1968, 161 (3842) :680-&
[8]  
RAPP RH, 1974, 211 OSU
[9]   Barometric tides from ECMWF operational analyses [J].
Ray, RD ;
Ponte, RM .
ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2003, 21 (08) :1897-1910
[10]  
RAY RD, 1999, 1999209478 NASA GSFC