An integrated approach to hydrologic data assimilation: interpolation, smoothing, and filtering

被引:169
作者
McLaughlin, D [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Ralph M Parsons Lab, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00055-6
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The hydrologic data assimilation problem can be posed in a probabilistic framework that emphasizes the need to account for uncertainty when combining different sources of information. This framework indicates where approximations need to be introduced and provides a way to compare alternative data assimilation methods. When discussing data assimilation it is useful to distinguish interpolation, smoothing, and filtering problems. Interpolation is illustrated here with an example based on multi-scale estimation of rainfall during the TOAGA-COARE field experiment. Smoothing is illustrated with a variational soil moisture estimation algorithm applied to the SGP97 field experiment. Filtering is illustrated with an ensemble Kalman filter, also applied to the SGP97 experiment. All of these data assimilation algorithms implicitly rely on linear Gaussian assumptions that can only be expected to apply in special cases. Although more general nonlinear data assimilation methods are available they are not practical for the very large problems frequently encountered in hydrology. Future research in hydrologic data assimilation will be need to focus on the issue of high dimensionality and on the need for more realistic descriptions of model and measurement error. This effort will be most successful if the modeling and data assimilation problems are approached in a coordinated way. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1286
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Bard Y., 1974, Nonlinear Parameter Estimation
[2]  
Bennett AF, 1992, INVERSE METHODS PHYS
[3]  
Bryson A. E., 1975, APPL OPTIMAL CONTROL
[4]   Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations [J].
Chen, F ;
Mitchell, K ;
Schaake, J ;
Xue, YK ;
Pan, HL ;
Koren, V ;
Duan, QY ;
Ek, M ;
Betts, A .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D3) :7251-7268
[5]   IMPORTANT LITERATURE ON THE USE OF ADJOINT, VARIATIONAL-METHODS AND THE KALMAN FILTER IN METEOROLOGY [J].
COURTIER, P ;
DERBER, J ;
ERRICO, R ;
LOUIS, JF ;
VUKICEVIC, T .
TELLUS SERIES A-DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1993, 45A (05) :342-357
[6]  
Daley R., 1991, Atmospheric data analysis
[7]   A multiscale approach for estimating solute travel time distributions [J].
Daniel, MM ;
Willsky, AS ;
McLaughlin, D .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2000, 23 (06) :653-665
[8]  
de Marsily G., 1986, QUANTITATIVE HYDROGE
[9]  
Entekhabi D, 1999, B AM METEOROL SOC, V80, P2043, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<2043:AAFLSH>2.0.CO
[10]  
2